Moment of inertia of a square lamina through a diagonal

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the moment of inertia of a square lamina with uniform density about one of its diagonals. The original poster presents an integral approach to find the moment of inertia but encounters a discrepancy in the expected result.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the setup of the integral and the choice of coordinates, questioning the distance from the mass element to the diagonal axis. There are suggestions to use the perpendicular axis theorem and the parallel axis theorem, as well as alternative methods involving symmetry and geometric properties of the square.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing various insights and methods to approach the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of geometric properties and symmetry, but no consensus has been reached on a single method to solve the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the need to clarify the distance from the mass element to the diagonal axis and explore different coordinate systems to simplify the integration process. There is also mention of the symmetry of the square lamina affecting the calculations.

eprparadox
Messages
133
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Square lamina (of side a) of uniform density. Find I about a diagonal.


Homework Equations


I = ∫ dm*l^2


The Attempt at a Solution



So I drew a square and its diagonal and I imagine a differential mass drawn somewhere on the lamina. The distance squared to that differential mass from the diagonal axis is x^2 + y^2.

So I did the following integral:
<br /> \rho \int_ \frac{-a}{2}^\frac{a}{2} \int_\frac{-a}{2}^\frac{a}{2} (x^2 + y^2) dx dy<br />

thinking this would be the correct answer, however I get
<br /> \frac{1}{6}Ma^{2} <br />

which is wrong by a factor of \frac{1}{2}

I don't know where I'm going wrong. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks so much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello. From the limits on your integral, it appears that you are choosing the plate to lie in the xy plane with edges parallel to the x and y axes and with the center of the plate at the origin of the coordinate system.

If (x,y) are the coordinates of a mass element ρdxdy, then x2 + y2 would be the square of the distance of the mass element form the origin of the coordinate system rather than from a diagonal of the plate.
 
Last edited:
Hey, thanks so much for the response. So I guess I'm lost then as to find the distance from the axis to the differential mass piece.

I don't know if I'm going about this inefficiently by not using the perpendicular axis theorem or the parallel axis theorem somehow, but I wanted to try to do this just through the definition of the moment of inertia.

Is there an easy way to find that distance from the axis to the differential mass piece in question? (ie, that l^2 term)

Thanks again
 
eprparadox said:
Is there an easy way to find that distance from the axis to the differential mass piece in question?
Not sure it's the easiest, but:
- what is the slope of a line perpendicular to the diagonal axis?
- what therefore is the equation of such a line through the point (x0, y0)?
- where does that line intersect the diagonal?
- what is the distance from (x0, y0) to that intersection?
 
eprparadox said:
Is there an easy way to find that distance from the axis to the differential mass piece in question? (ie, that l^2 term)
If you are familiar with the cross product, think about what you would get if you took the cross product of the position vector ##\vec{r}## locating the mass element at (x,y) and a unit vector ##\hat{u}## along the diagonal.
 
eprparadox said:
Square lamina (of side a) of uniform density. Find I about a diagonal.

Instead of a direct integral along the diagonal you can also use the fact that for a lamina Iz = Ix + Iy and that Ix + Iy = 2Ix for any rotation around z of the lamina where the lamina is identical distributed around both x and y. Since there are two geometrically different rotations of a square lamina where Ix and Iy are identical (with x and y along the diagonals being one such rotation), you can convert your integral along diagonals into an integral along the axis of the "other rotation".
 
Filip Larsen said:
Instead of a direct integral along the diagonal you can also use the fact that for a lamina Iz = Ix + Iy and that Ix + Iy = 2Ix for any rotation around z of the lamina where the lamina is identical distributed around both x and y. Since there are two geometrically different rotations of a square lamina where Ix and Iy are identical (with x and y along the diagonals being one such rotation), you can convert your integral along diagonals into an integral along the axis of the "other rotation".
Very neat.
 
How would you solve this problem using direct integration across the diagonal?

I can't seem to figure out how to get the distance from the diagonal axis.

Thanks
 
I think it would be easier to put the origin at the center of the square and the diagonals along the ##x## and ##y## axes. This results in a single integral, most simply along the ##x## axis. Due to symmetry you only have to do the integration in the first quadrant, and multiply that answer by 4.
 
  • #10
bawbag said:
How would you solve this problem using direct integration across the diagonal?

I can't seem to figure out how to get the distance from the diagonal axis.

Thanks
Put the y-axis along the diagonal. Consider a right triangle that is 1/4 of the square with one right side along y and the other along x. A strip on the lamina parallel to the x-axis of length x and width dy located at distance y from the x-axis has moment of inertia (about the diagonal) given by ##dI = \frac{1}{3} ~ dm ~x^2## where ##dm = \frac{m}{a^2} ~x ~dy##.
Note that because we have a square, the length of the strip, x, equals its distance from the y-axis, y.

Therefore ##y=x## and ##dy = dx##. Integrate from ##x=0## to ##x=a/\sqrt{2}## and don't forget to multiply the result by 4 to get the moment of inertia of the full square.

On edit: This is an elaboration of the post by @tms.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
52
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K