Moment of inertia of a thin, square plate

  • Thread starter Thread starter simphys
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moment of inertia
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the moment of inertia of a thin square plate, specifically addressing confusion about the integrals used in the calculation. Participants highlight that the second line of the derivation is incorrect due to an extra dx and missing r², emphasizing the need for proper limits of integration. It is clarified that the moment of inertia about the x-axis requires expressing r² in terms of x and y, which relates to the perpendicular axis theorem. One participant expresses difficulty in understanding the use of two integrals, preferring a single definite integral approach. The conversation underscores the importance of correctly summing mass elements over the object's volume for accurate calculations.
simphys
Messages
327
Reaction score
46
Homework Statement
the moment of inertia about an axis through the center of and perpendicular to a uniform, thin square plate. mass M and dimension L x L.
Relevant Equations
d
I don't really understand what the 2 integrals (dx and dxdy) for I_x represent. Could I get some explanation here please? Thanks in advance.
1692111880738.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The second line in the derivation of ##I_x## has one ##dx## too many. Is that what bothers you?
 
Also, the second line is missing the ##r^2## and the limits of integration for ##x## are not correct. Keep in mind that this integral represents the moment of inertia about the x-axis, and the x-axis lies in the plane of the thin plate. Think about how to express ##r^2## in terms of ##x## and/or ##y##.
 
If you put in the correct $$r^2=x^2+ y^2$$ in the second line then you see that the x and y integrals give you the "perpendicular axis theorem" without issue. Please redo this.
 
TSny said:
Also, the second line is missing the ##r^2## and the limits of integration for ##x## are not correct. Keep in mind that this integral represents the moment of inertia about the x-axis, and the x-axis lies in the plane of the thin plate. Think about how to express ##r^2## in terms of ##x## and/or ##y##.
Yep, that is what I did I expressed in terms of y^2 and then went ahead with that. But I just didn't understand how this solution came about basically.
 
hutchphd said:
If you put in the correct $$r^2=x^2+ y^2$$ in the second line then you see that the x and y integrals give you the "perpendicular axis theorem" without issue. Please redo this.
this is the solution. not mine :)
 
So where is your attempt? How are we to help?
 
hutchphd said:
So where is your attempt? How are we to help?
well.. that is exactly what I don't understand..
I didn't understand why the solution has used two integrals in such a way.. I haven't used a volume integral or smtn. I did differently by using a mass element and summing over that with one definite integral.
 
One must sum each mass element (mass density times volume element) over the entire volume of the object and scaled by the square of the distance to the chosen axis . The world is three dimensional and so is the integral. Show us your work.
 
Back
Top