Moment of inertia of a three particle system

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the moment of inertia of a three-particle system around the z-axis, with particles located at specific coordinates. The center of mass was correctly determined to be at (0, -a/3). The moment of inertia was calculated using the formula I = Σmp², leading to an initial result of approximately 4.67ma². However, this result differs from the book's answer of 4.01ma², prompting the user to seek clarification on potential errors in their calculations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately interpreting the problem and verifying each step in the calculation process.
Avatrin
Messages
242
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


I have three particles of mass m at (-a,-a), (a,-a) and (0,a)

Find the moment of inertia I_z around the center of mass of the system for an axis along the z-axis.

Homework Equations


Center of mass:
CM = Ʃmr

Moment of inertia:
I = Ʃmp^2

m = mass
r = position
p = distance from axis

The Attempt at a Solution


I found that the center of mass is CM = (0,-a/3);
CM_x = (-am + am + 0m)/3m = 0
CM_y = (-a-a+a)m/3m = -a/3
This is something I know is correct..

The real problem starts with the moment of inertia:
p_1 = 4a/3
p_2 = p_3 = √(a^2 + (2a/3)^2)

(p_1)^2 = (16/9)a^2
(p_2)^2 = (a^2 + (2a/3)^2) = (13/9)a^2

Ʃmp^2 = m(16/9)a^2 + m(13/9)a^2 + m(13/9)a^2
= m((16/9)a^2 + (26/9)a^2) ≈ 4.67ma^2

The problem is that the book says that the solution is 4.01ma^2. Where have I made a mistake?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Avatrin said:
The problem is that the book says that the solution is 4.01ma^2. Where have I made a mistake?

I got the answer that you had as well. Make sure that you've read the question correctly.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K