Momentum space particle in a box

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the particle in a box energy eigenvalue problem using momentum space rather than traditional differential equations. The proposed method involves expressing the wave function as a combination of momentum eigenstates within a defined box, but challenges arise in adjusting the potential for momentum representation. Participants suggest looking for linear combinations of free particle solutions that satisfy boundary conditions, particularly for a perfect box where edges must approach zero. Concerns are raised about the complexities of applying boundary conditions in momentum space and the non-Hermitian nature of the momentum operator, which complicates the eigenvalue problem. Overall, the thread highlights the difficulties in adapting momentum space techniques to bound systems.
tomothy
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I am trying to formulate a solution to the particle in a box energy eigenvalue problem, without solving a differential equation, instead using eigenvectors of p^2. My idea is to do this. Within the box (let's say it is defined between [-a,a] and within this region the hamiltonian is H={p^2}/{2m} so the solution is |\psi\rangle=c_+|p\rangle + c_- |-p\rangle. This approach is really the free particle, but I cannot work out how to adjust the potential for the momentum representation. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You know the solutions to the free particle are e^{ipx}, so look for linear combinations of those such that they match the boundary conditions. If you are talking about a perfect box, then look for linear combinations such that the edges go to 0.
 
Fourier transform of the potential? It would be an oscillating and nasty thing. Also the boundary condition in the momentum space would be difficult to concider. Also remember that the momentum is not an eigenvalue for the bound problem (i.e., momentum and posistion are both uncertain).
The momentum operator is not hermitean either (->no real eigenvalues).
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 153 ·
6
Replies
153
Views
16K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K