Momentum transfer in electron-proton collision

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a head-on collision between a proton and an electron, specifically focusing on the squared 4-momentum transfer between the two particles. Participants explore the implications of different definitions of the angle involved in the collision and how it affects the calculations of momentum transfer.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the squared momentum transfer using 4-vectors and questions the correctness of their approach compared to another participant's result. There are discussions about the definitions of the angle ##\theta## and how it influences the calculations. Some participants suggest that both equations could be correct depending on the definition of ##\theta## used.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging in clarifying definitions and interpretations of the angle ##\theta##, with some suggesting that testing simple values can help validate the equations. There is recognition of differing perspectives on the angle's definition, but no explicit consensus has been reached regarding the correct form of the squared momentum transfer.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the assumption that the masses of the electron and proton can be ignored due to high energies, and the discussion reflects on the implications of this assumption in the context of the calculations being performed.

TheMercury79
Messages
24
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
What is the squared 4-momentum transfer between the particles
Relevant Equations
4-momentum vector P = (E/c, ##\vec p##)
In a head-on collision between the proton and electron, what is the squared 4-momentum transfer between the two particles.

Starting with the difference in momentum of the electron with the 4-vectors before and after the event: $$(P-P')^2=P^2+P'^2-2P\cdot P'$$
The circumstances are such that the energies are large enough for the masses of the electron and proton to be ignored, thus ##E\sim pc## and ##E'\sim p'c##. Where ##E## is the energy of the electron before collision, ##E'## the energy of the electron after collision and ##\theta## is the angle between the the electron before and after the collision. Then:$$(P-P')^2=m_e^2c^2+m_e^2c^2-2(\frac{EE'}{c^2}-\vec p \cdot \vec p')\sim -2\frac{EE'}{c^2}(1-cos\theta)$$

The squared momentum transer would accordingly be ##Q^2=-2\frac{EE'}{c^2}(1-cos\theta)##

But I was told it is ##Q^2=-2\frac{EE'}{c^2}(1+cos\theta)##. These differ only by a plus and minus sign.

I think it is a bit weird that in my calculation above, I didn't have to include the proton at all. But then again I figure the momentum transfer is what the electron transfers to the electron (correct me if I'm not using the term momentum transfer correctly).

I am thinking I could perhaps use Mandelstam variables and include the proton in the calculation and see if I somehow end up with a positive cos-term instead of the negative.

Or is my calculation ##Q^2=-2\frac{EE'}{c^2}(1-cos\theta)## correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you using the same definition of ##\theta##?
 
With your definition, if ##\theta = 0## there is no collision and no momentum transfer. So the ##-## looks right.
 
PeroK said:
With your definition, if ##\theta = 0## there is no collision and no momentum transfer. So the ##-## looks right.
maybe I formulated it badly but the original statement was"##\theta## is the angle between the outgoing electron and the incoming proton". I figured the collision was head on, so this is the same as what I said "##\theta## is the angle between the electron before and after the collision"
I don't see where I said ##\theta=0##
 
TheMercury79 said:
maybe I formulated it badly but the original statement was"##\theta## is the angle between the outgoing electron and the incoming proton".
Exactly, their ##\theta## is the opposite of yours. Both equations are correct, with a different definition of ##\theta## is each case.

TheMercury79 said:
I don't see where I said ##\theta=0##
Choosing a simple value of ##\theta## to test your equation is a common idea. Your equation works with ##\theta = 0##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TheMercury79
PeroK said:
Exactly, their ##\theta## is the opposite of yours. Both equations are correct, with a different definition of ##\theta## is each case.Choosing a simple value of ##\theta## to test your equation is a common idea. Your equation works with ##\theta = 0##.
But the correct answer is supposed to be ##Q^2=-4\frac{EE'}{c^2}cos^2\frac{\theta}{2}## I just put in it the other form to illustrate the plus and minus difference.

And I instead got ##Q^2=-4\frac{EE'}{c^2}sin^2\frac{\theta}{2}##
 
Last edited:
Your ##\theta## isn't the same as the one specified in the problem statement.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TheMercury79 and PeroK
vela said:
Your ##\theta## isn't the same as the one specified in the problem statement.
Now I see it! Pero said the same thing but he threw me off by insisting we should set ##\theta## to zero
 
TheMercury79 said:
Now I see it! Pero said the same thing but he threw me off by insisting we should set ##\theta## to zero
I didn't insist! It was just the obvious example to sanity check your answer.

How have you got this far in your studies without trying simple values to check a formula makes sense? 🤔
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vela
  • #10
PeroK said:
I didn't insist! It was just the obvious example to sanity check your answer.

How have you got this far in your studies without trying simple values to check a formula makes sense? 🤔
Because I knew the answer is not zero. Why should I check and see if the answer i zero? That's just ridiculous, of course it's not zero.
 
  • Skeptical
  • Sad
Likes   Reactions: vela and PeroK
  • #11
anyway, thanks for the help
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K