Momentum transfer in electron-proton collision

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the squared 4-momentum transfer in a head-on collision between an electron and a proton. The initial calculation presented was ##Q^2=-2\frac{EE'}{c^2}(1-cos\theta)##, which was later compared to the correct form ##Q^2=-4\frac{EE'}{c^2}cos^2\frac{\theta}{2}##. The discrepancy arises from differing definitions of the angle ##\theta##, with participants clarifying that both equations are valid under their respective definitions. The conversation emphasizes the importance of consistent terminology and definitions in physics calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of 4-momentum in particle physics
  • Familiarity with the concept of momentum transfer
  • Knowledge of Mandelstam variables
  • Basic trigonometry, specifically sine and cosine functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Mandelstam variables in particle collisions
  • Learn about the implications of different angle definitions in momentum transfer calculations
  • Explore the relationship between energy and momentum in relativistic physics
  • Investigate the role of scattering angles in high-energy particle physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in particle physics, particularly those focusing on collision dynamics and momentum transfer analysis. This discussion is beneficial for anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of relativistic collisions and the mathematical frameworks involved.

TheMercury79
Messages
24
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
What is the squared 4-momentum transfer between the particles
Relevant Equations
4-momentum vector P = (E/c, ##\vec p##)
In a head-on collision between the proton and electron, what is the squared 4-momentum transfer between the two particles.

Starting with the difference in momentum of the electron with the 4-vectors before and after the event: $$(P-P')^2=P^2+P'^2-2P\cdot P'$$
The circumstances are such that the energies are large enough for the masses of the electron and proton to be ignored, thus ##E\sim pc## and ##E'\sim p'c##. Where ##E## is the energy of the electron before collision, ##E'## the energy of the electron after collision and ##\theta## is the angle between the the electron before and after the collision. Then:$$(P-P')^2=m_e^2c^2+m_e^2c^2-2(\frac{EE'}{c^2}-\vec p \cdot \vec p')\sim -2\frac{EE'}{c^2}(1-cos\theta)$$

The squared momentum transer would accordingly be ##Q^2=-2\frac{EE'}{c^2}(1-cos\theta)##

But I was told it is ##Q^2=-2\frac{EE'}{c^2}(1+cos\theta)##. These differ only by a plus and minus sign.

I think it is a bit weird that in my calculation above, I didn't have to include the proton at all. But then again I figure the momentum transfer is what the electron transfers to the electron (correct me if I'm not using the term momentum transfer correctly).

I am thinking I could perhaps use Mandelstam variables and include the proton in the calculation and see if I somehow end up with a positive cos-term instead of the negative.

Or is my calculation ##Q^2=-2\frac{EE'}{c^2}(1-cos\theta)## correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you using the same definition of ##\theta##?
 
With your definition, if ##\theta = 0## there is no collision and no momentum transfer. So the ##-## looks right.
 
PeroK said:
With your definition, if ##\theta = 0## there is no collision and no momentum transfer. So the ##-## looks right.
maybe I formulated it badly but the original statement was"##\theta## is the angle between the outgoing electron and the incoming proton". I figured the collision was head on, so this is the same as what I said "##\theta## is the angle between the electron before and after the collision"
I don't see where I said ##\theta=0##
 
TheMercury79 said:
maybe I formulated it badly but the original statement was"##\theta## is the angle between the outgoing electron and the incoming proton".
Exactly, their ##\theta## is the opposite of yours. Both equations are correct, with a different definition of ##\theta## is each case.

TheMercury79 said:
I don't see where I said ##\theta=0##
Choosing a simple value of ##\theta## to test your equation is a common idea. Your equation works with ##\theta = 0##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TheMercury79
PeroK said:
Exactly, their ##\theta## is the opposite of yours. Both equations are correct, with a different definition of ##\theta## is each case.Choosing a simple value of ##\theta## to test your equation is a common idea. Your equation works with ##\theta = 0##.
But the correct answer is supposed to be ##Q^2=-4\frac{EE'}{c^2}cos^2\frac{\theta}{2}## I just put in it the other form to illustrate the plus and minus difference.

And I instead got ##Q^2=-4\frac{EE'}{c^2}sin^2\frac{\theta}{2}##
 
Last edited:
Your ##\theta## isn't the same as the one specified in the problem statement.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TheMercury79 and PeroK
vela said:
Your ##\theta## isn't the same as the one specified in the problem statement.
Now I see it! Pero said the same thing but he threw me off by insisting we should set ##\theta## to zero
 
TheMercury79 said:
Now I see it! Pero said the same thing but he threw me off by insisting we should set ##\theta## to zero
I didn't insist! It was just the obvious example to sanity check your answer.

How have you got this far in your studies without trying simple values to check a formula makes sense? 🤔
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vela
  • #10
PeroK said:
I didn't insist! It was just the obvious example to sanity check your answer.

How have you got this far in your studies without trying simple values to check a formula makes sense? 🤔
Because I knew the answer is not zero. Why should I check and see if the answer i zero? That's just ridiculous, of course it's not zero.
 
  • Skeptical
  • Sad
Likes   Reactions: vela and PeroK
  • #11
anyway, thanks for the help
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K