Monkey moves robotic arm with brain implant

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Arm Brain
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a controversial experiment involving a monkey controlling a robotic arm through a brain implant. Critics have labeled the experiment as "unethical" and "pointless," expressing concerns about the potential suffering of the animal involved. The use of dental cement in the procedure has drawn particular ire, with some participants questioning the researchers' ethics and motivations. Overall, the conversation highlights the tension between scientific advancement and ethical considerations in animal research.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of neuroprosthetics and brain-computer interfaces
  • Familiarity with ethical standards in animal research
  • Knowledge of the implications of invasive surgical procedures
  • Awareness of public perception and media influence on scientific research
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the latest advancements in brain-computer interface technology
  • Explore ethical frameworks governing animal experimentation
  • Investigate public opinion trends regarding neurotechnology
  • Learn about the use of dental cement in surgical applications
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for neuroscientists, bioethicists, animal rights advocates, and anyone interested in the intersection of technology and ethics in scientific research.

Computer science news on Phys.org
Yes, I saw this on another forum I use.

very interesting..

Shame about the Hannibal-Lecter type approach to it though. Dental cement?

Jonathan
 
When this news came up on a newpaper in the UK, the next day came up a letter from a member of the public declaring the experiment "unethical", labelling it as "pointless", and that the monkey would have been in "horrific suffering" for "probably months", and the researchers as "callous" - even though nothing approaching this was mentioned in the article.

Especially halirious was the line where she said: "These so-called 'scientists'..."

Not quite reassuring as to the objectivity and knowledge of certain parts of the public, eh?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K