Monochromatic Light & Information: Can It Convey?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nomadreid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Signal
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around whether monochromatic light can convey information, examining the definitions and implications of monochromatic waves in the context of information theory and physics. Participants explore theoretical and conceptual aspects of this topic.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant cites sources claiming that monochromatic light cannot convey information because it is a simple periodic wave with no changes.
  • Another participant argues that while a pure monochromatic wave is sinusoidal and infinite in duration, it cannot convey information due to its unchanging nature.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that the observer's lack of prior knowledge about the signal could allow even a repetitive pattern to be considered information.
  • One participant posits that as the signal duration approaches infinity, the information content approaches zero, questioning the feasibility of transmitting meaningful content over a monochromatic beam.
  • Another participant acknowledges that while monochromatic waves transmit little information, they argue that it is incorrect to state that they convey no information at all, emphasizing the energy aspect of light.
  • A counterpoint is raised that true monochromaticity implies no modulation, and thus no information can be conveyed in the limit of infinite duration.
  • One participant expresses gratitude for the insights shared and indicates a willingness to reconsider their understanding based on the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether monochromatic light can convey any information at all, with some asserting it conveys none and others suggesting it can convey limited information. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference concepts from information theory and Fourier analysis, indicating that definitions and assumptions about monochromaticity and information transmission are critical to the discussion.

nomadreid
Gold Member
Messages
1,773
Reaction score
256
I have read in several places that monochromatic light cannot convey information; e.g. in http://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath210/kmath210.htm. it is stated that "in order to actually convey information, a signal cannot be a simple periodic wave". But doesn't all light have the energy hf? And doesn't that mean that we can effect a change, for example by Schrödinger's equation? And isn't every change a piece of information? So why wouldn't a monochromatic pulse of light convey information?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By definition a pure monochromatic wave is sinusoidal and infinite in duration, so must have no changes at all. But no information can be conveyed by a wave whose character is known exactly and never varies. In fact, change is required to convey information. Extending this to its logical conclusion yeilds Shannon's information theory, which states that maximum information transfer corresponds to maximum entropy or minimum a priori knowledge of what signal to expect. This is why a monochromatic wave cannot carry information.
 
Thank you. There seems to be a problem with semantics: your reply makes perfect sense if one knows in advance that the light is monochromatic. If one is however the observer receiving a signal, and not knowing what the signal is, then even 11111111111... will constitute information because it is different from, say, 1010101010101010...
 
As the signal duration becomes infinite and the frequency content a delta function, the information content approaches zero. Try sending your paragraph (which contains little information by modern standards, only a few hundred bytes) over a monochromatic beam. You can't.
 
I understand that not much information can be transmitted on a monochromatic wave, but there is a difference between "not much" and "zero". Even if it transmits only a single bit of information, this would be different to the statement that it can transmit none. To take a silly example, it is agreed that as long as energy is being received from your planet, we will not destroy it. Monochromatic light is not no light, and it does carry energy; energy, by its very definition, is something which can cause a measurable change. No?
 
No. If you allow it to turn off, to signal that we want our planet to be destroyed, the wave is not monochromatic--it's been modulated, and that modulation carries the information. True monochromaticity can only be accomplished by infinite time. Have you studied Fourier theory? Review the time-frequency uncertainty relations in Bracewell or Papoulis. A monochromatic wave existed before the Big Bang, before one planet could negotiate with another, and it exists unchanged after both planets die and the universe explodes or crunches or whatever it does. In the limit of infinite duration and delta function frequency, there's no information conveyed. Not "not much." None.
 
Last edited:
Thank you, Marcus. Yes, I have studied the basics of Fourier Theory, and I shall re-think the issue on the lines you recommended. Thanks again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 143 ·
5
Replies
143
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K