How massive is a monopole particle compared to a proton?

  • Thread starter Thread starter diogenesNY
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Monopole
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the estimated mass of magnetic monopoles, which are theorized to be around 10^17 GeV, making them approximately 10^17 times heavier than protons. Alan Guth's insights suggest that creating such particles would require immense energy, equivalent to a linear accelerator spanning 70 light years. Participants note that this mass translates to about 1.67^-10 Kg, comparable to a grain of pollen, indicating it is nominally macroscopic. The Higgs boson, for context, is significantly lighter at about 126 protons, highlighting the extraordinary mass of the proposed monopole. The conversation reflects on the challenges of understanding particle scales in relation to human perception.
diogenesNY
Messages
230
Reaction score
259
Please forgive the thread title... it just kinda slipped out that way.

I am reading and enjoying Alan Guth's _The Inflationary Universe_. Dr. Guth is not only in command of a very lucid style of exposition, but he has a very subtle and penetrating sense of humor.

Anyway... He relates a conversation with Henry Tye. Essentially, they agreed, GUT implied the existence of magnetic monopoles. They noted that these were likely 10^16 GeV particles; it would take that much energy to create one. Guth estimates that using SLAC as a model, that sort of energy would require (using 1974 technology) a linear accelerator with a length of about 70 light years. It was also noted that this particle would be really heavy with a mass of about 10^17 GeV or about 10^17 times as massive as a proton.

Now on to my attempt at a scratchpad visualization.

Taking the mass of a Proton as 1.6726^-27 Kg, (multiple internet sites of reasonable provenance cite this figure), some simple math would place this hypothesized particle to have a mass of approximately 1.67^-10Kg.

I get that this is huge as a particle mass, but I am really a loss for a sense of scale here. I can write out the numbers. It does not appear macroscopic. Nevertheless, what, for example, weighs about 1.67^-10Kg? Just trying to wrap my head around this unusual, intermediate scale.

diogenesNY
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks...cool... looks like it is sort of nominally macroscopic after all.

I didn't think to look for orders of magnitude... I just kicked around the number and didn't get all that far. ;)

diogenesNY

P.S. That really is one heck of a massive proposed particle.

P.P.S. Scratching around, it looks like the Higgs Boson, a very massive particle, has a mass of approximately 126 protons.
 
Last edited:
The Higgs boson is 14 orders of magnitude lighter than the suggest GUT scale. And it is lighter than the top quark.
 
The Planck Mass is often compared to a flea's egg or a dust mote (Susskind).

Susskind attributes some of our difficulties to the anthropocentric scale that we impress on the universe.
 
Hi everyone, I am doing a final project on the title " fundamentals of neutrino physics". I wanted to raise some issues with neutrino which makes it the possible way to the physics beyond standard model. I am myself doing some research on these topics but at some points the math bugs me out. Anyway, i have some questions which answers themselves confounded me due to the complicated math. Some pf them are: 1. Why wouldn't there be a mirror image of a neutrino? Is it because they are...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K