Moon Landing: What Flag & Part Was Used?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsuser
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moon
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Apollo moon landing, specifically addressing the location of the landing, the visibility of the landing site from Earth, the type of flag used, and the technological capabilities of the United States during the 1960s. Participants explore various aspects of the moon landing, including conspiracy theories and the historical context of the space race.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants clarify that the Apollo missions landed on the near side of the moon, while others mention that the far side was considered for a potential mission that was ultimately canceled.
  • There is a discussion about whether the landing sites can be resolved with telescopes, with some stating that the details are too small to be seen, even with advanced telescopes like Hubble.
  • Participants mention that astronauts set up mirrors on the moon for laser ranging, which can be used to demonstrate human presence on the lunar surface.
  • Some express skepticism about the technological capabilities of the 1960s, questioning how astronauts could have successfully landed on the moon given prior failures in space missions.
  • Others assert that the technology existed and that the moon landing was a successful achievement, citing the rapid advancements made in a short time frame.
  • Conspiracy theories regarding the moon landing are introduced, with some participants referencing documentaries that question the authenticity of the landings, while others dismiss these theories as unfounded.
  • There is a mention of the flag used during the moon landing, with one participant noting that it had a wire to keep it upright despite the moon's gravity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with some agreeing on the basic facts of the moon landing while others engage in debates about the technological capabilities of the time and the validity of conspiracy theories. No consensus is reached on the skepticism surrounding the moon landing or the technological advancements of the 1960s.

Contextual Notes

Some claims about visibility from telescopes depend on the definitions of resolution and light gathering capability, and there are unresolved discussions about the technological developments leading up to the moon landing.

  • #31
In regards to the Apolo moon walks, I don't discount they have been made. There of course would be a heat factor on their suits although I do not think as much as being on a planet that is absorbing all that radiation.
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #32
Altune said:
In regards to the Apollo moon walks, I don't discount they have been made. There of course would be a heat factor on their suits although I do not think as much as being on a planet that is absorbing all that radiation.
Like the Earth the moon is very nearly in thermal equilibrium. It radiates as much heat way as it receives from the sun. Do you really think that we are so ignorant of the moon as not to understand these things you mention? There were many unmanned lunar missions before the Apollo missions were started. Things like the temperature can be pretty well measured and understood from earth.

We were very lucky not to have lost any astronauts in space. But, it was not ALL luck, an incredible amount of work went into understanding the conditions we would encounter on the Apollo flights, we were prepared. We understood the conditions on the surface of the moon and in space between here and there.
 
  • #33
As Tom Hanks said in "Apollo 13" - "We do have half the pHd's on the planet working on this..."

What gets me is the conspiracy theorists seem to think they pick up on little inconsistencies that a hundred thousand scientists and engineers missed in the creation of the "hoax." Yeah, right.
 
  • #34
I understand now. We developed all the technology along the way. Maybe they should dig up those engineers for these expensive Mars missions and solar radiation experements that go kaput.
 
  • #35
Altune. Read Titan by Stephen Baxtor. He had the same idea.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
920
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K