Moon Question (Vacuum, air, escape vel.)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the characteristics of the Moon, particularly its lack of atmosphere, the implications of being in a vacuum, and the effects of gravity on the Moon. Participants explore the reasons behind the Moon's atmospheric conditions and the nature of gravity in relation to jumping on the Moon.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the Moon has no atmosphere because it is biologically inactive and lacks sufficient mass to retain gases.
  • There is a suggestion that having an atmosphere does not necessarily equate to having air, leading to confusion about the definition of a vacuum.
  • One participant mentions that gravity is the reason a person would not drift off into space when jumping on the Moon, emphasizing that all objects with mass exert gravitational force.
  • Another participant challenges the idea that the Moon's lack of atmosphere is solely due to its biological inactivity, citing examples of other celestial bodies that off-gas without biological activity, such as Europa.
  • There are references to the geological activity of other moons, like Europa and Io, which have atmospheres due to their tectonic activity, contrasting with the Moon's inactive state.
  • One participant humorously points out that jumping "in the air" on the Moon is not feasible in the same way as on Earth, suggesting a misunderstanding of the Moon's gravity.
  • There is a claim that the Moon's atmosphere was lost due to the Solar Wind, adding another layer to the discussion about its current state.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the reasons for the Moon's lack of atmosphere and the implications of gravity. There is no consensus on the explanations provided, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the specifics of atmospheric loss and the role of biological activity.

Contextual Notes

Some statements rely on assumptions about geological activity and atmospheric retention that are not universally agreed upon. The definitions of terms like "vacuum" and "atmosphere" are also points of contention.

nukeman
Messages
651
Reaction score
0
Ok, this might seem like a silly question, but I just want to get it straight. Just tell me if anything I am saying is wrong, and answer the best you can.

Ok, the moon has no air, because it has no atmosphere correct? And the reason for no atmosphere is because the moon is biologically non-active, and the moon does not have enough mass to keep things from escaping the moon, including gases, which the moon does not give off because its biologically dead ?

The moon is simply apart of the vacuum of space because of the atmosphere correct?

So, the reason someone on the moon would not drift off into space if they jumped in the air is because the moon still of course has gravity, as everything with mass has gravity.


Now its your turn :)

Thanks guys!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
nukeman said:
Ok, the moon has no air, because it has no atmosphere correct?

Having an atmosphere doesn't necessarily mean having air...

The moon is simply apart of the vacuum of space because of the atmosphere correct?

This doesn't make much sense to me either. "Apart of the vacuum of space?" Vacuum is, by crude definition, the absence of matter.

So, the reason someone on the moon would not drift off into space if they jumped in the air is because the moon still of course has gravity, as everything with mass has gravity.

Right.
 
fss covered most of it. A few tweaks:
nukeman said:
And the reason for no atmosphere is because the moon is biologically non-active, and the moon does not have enough mass to keep things from escaping the moon, including gases, which the moon does not give off because its biologically dead ?
Planets certainly off-gas without being biologically active. Europa is spewing sulphur clouds from its interior.

But Europa is tectonically active; it has a liquid core. The Moon's core has long since cooled and is now dead. That's why it does not off-gas.


nukeman said:
So, the reason someone on the moon would not drift off into space if they jumped in the air is because the moon still of course has gravity, as everything with mass has gravity.
Well, of course, they couldn't "jump in the air" on the Moon, could they? :wink:

But yes, gravity is what holds things down, not atmo.
 
DaveC426913 said:
fss covered most of it. A few tweaks:

Planets certainly off-gas without being biologically active. Europa is spewing sulphur clouds from its interior.

But Europa is tectonically active; it has a liquid core. The Moon's core has long since cooled and is now dead. That's why it does not off-gas.

Io is the volcanic one. It has a thin atmosphere of mostly sulfur dioxide from all the sulfur and the like. During Io's night the atmosphere freezes, then defrosts just after dawn. Europa has a very, very thin atmosphere of oxygen, from ice that has been exposed to Jupiter's radiation belt and broken into oxygen and hydrogen.


Well, of course, they couldn't "jump in the air" on the Moon, could they? :wink:

But yes, gravity is what holds things down, not atmo.

The Moon BTW doesn't have an atmosphere because it was blown away, long ago, by the Solar Wind.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K