Moonlander new video (very funny)

  • Thread starter Thread starter GoncaloB
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Funny Video
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion highlights the stark contrast between the technological marvel of the Apollo lunar module in 1969 and today's advanced computing capabilities. It emphasizes that the moon lander, once a pinnacle of engineering, is now comparable to modern toys like the Furby. The conversation reflects on the rapid acceleration of technology and its implications, questioning the limits of human innovation. National Geographic's exploration into these advancements reveals both awe and concern regarding future possibilities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Apollo 11 mission history
  • Familiarity with basic engineering principles
  • Knowledge of technological evolution and its societal impacts
  • Awareness of National Geographic's scientific research methodologies
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the engineering design principles of the Apollo lunar module
  • Explore advancements in computing technology since 1969
  • Investigate the societal impacts of rapid technological progress
  • Examine National Geographic's coverage of space exploration and technology
USEFUL FOR

Historians, engineers, technology enthusiasts, and anyone interested in the evolution of space exploration and its implications for future innovations.

GoncaloB
Messages
1
Reaction score
0


In 1969 when Armstrong first landed on the moon, it was the biggest event of our time. It left everyone watching in awe. The moon lander, a machine that looked like a miracle in technology at the time, is nowadays the technical equivalent of something so small and insignificant as a Furby toy.
Technological progress is so accelerated that even the humans that are behind the technology are surprised by its power and potential. We ask the question "how far can we really go?" The conclusions we reach may surprise and even scare us. National Geographic goes deep into scientific research to find answers for these questions.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
GoncaloB said:


In 1969 when Armstrong first landed on the moon, it was the biggest event of our time. It left everyone watching in awe. The moon lander, a machine that looked like a miracle in technology at the time, is nowadays the technical equivalent of something so small and insignificant as a Furby toy...
This reflects an obsession w/ advances in computing power. The sum of lander engineering was much, much more than its computing
capability.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
mheslep said:
The sum of lander engineering was much, much more than its computing capability.
That has to be the understatement of the year. The lander alone represents millions of hours of engineering, design, construction, and testing. The fact that it even could be run on that little computer power is a testament to the engineering prowess of those who designed it.
 

Similar threads

  • Sticky
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
70K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K