More friction-related wackiness

  • Thread starter Thread starter legking
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating forces acting on a 22 kg box resting on a 45-degree ramp with static and kinetic friction coefficients of μS = 0.78 and μK = 0.65. The largest force that can be applied upward, parallel to the ramp, while keeping the box at rest is determined to be 271.5 N. The discussion also addresses the challenge of calculating the smallest force applied perpendicular to the ramp, emphasizing the need to set up equilibrium equations considering the forces involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of free body diagrams (FBD)
  • Knowledge of static and kinetic friction coefficients
  • Basic principles of equilibrium in physics
  • Ability to resolve forces into components
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to set up equilibrium equations for forces on inclined planes
  • Study the effects of different friction coefficients on force calculations
  • Explore the concept of normal force in various scenarios
  • Investigate the role of angles in force resolution and vector analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and forces, as well as educators looking for practical examples of force calculations on inclined planes.

legking
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
*ahem*

A box with a mass of 22 kg is at rest on a ramp inclined at 45 deg to the horizontal. The coefficients of friction between the box and the ramp are [tex]\mu_S = 0.78[/tex] and [tex]\mu_K = 0.65[/tex].

a) Determine the magnitude of the largest force that can be applied upward, parallel to the ramp, if the box is to remain at rest.

b) Determine the magnitude of the smallest force that can be applied onto the top of the box, perpendicular to the ramp, if the box is to remain at rest.

Answers:

a) K, I have a FBD with an applied force acting upwards parallel to the ramp, static friction acting in the opposite direction, gravity acting directly downwards, and normal force acting away from, and perpendicular to, the ramp.

I have also designated the directions upwards both parallel to and perpendicular to the ramp as positive.

If the box is to remain at rest, the applied force must equal the friction and the portion of the gravity acting against the ramp, or Fa = Ff + Fgr.

(I also noticed that, at an angle of 45 deg, the vectors for Fg, Fn and Fgr form an isoscles triangle, making Fn equal to Fgr.)

So,

Fa = Ff + Fgr
Fa = (mu)S * mg cos 45 + mg sin 45
Fa = (0.78)(22)(9.8) cos 45 + (22)(9.8) sin 45
Fa = 118.95 +152.5
Fa = 271.5 N

b) So this is where I get a little lost. My FBD has applied force into the box perpendicular to the ramp, both static friction and the normal force acting in the opposite direction, and gravity acting downwards. I just don't know what to do to develop an equation that doesn't look exactly like the one I developed in a). Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
legking said:
a) K, I have a FBD with an applied force acting upwards parallel to the ramp, static friction acting in the opposite direction, gravity acting directly downwards, and normal force acting away from, and perpendicular to, the ramp.

I have also designated the directions upwards both parallel to and perpendicular to the ramp as positive.

If the box is to remain at rest, the applied force must equal the friction and the portion of the gravity acting against the ramp, or Fa = Ff + Fgr.

(I also noticed that, at an angle of 45 deg, the vectors for Fg, Fn and Fgr form an isoscles triangle, making Fn equal to Fgr.)

So,

Fa = Ff + Fgr
Fa = (mu)S * mg cos 45 + mg sin 45
Fa = (0.78)(22)(9.8) cos 45 + (22)(9.8) sin 45
Fa = 118.95 +152.5
Fa = 271.5 N
I didn't check your arithmetic, but your method is correct.

b) So this is where I get a little lost. My FBD has applied force into the box perpendicular to the ramp, both static friction and the normal force acting in the opposite direction, and gravity acting downwards. I just don't know what to do to develop an equation that doesn't look exactly like the one I developed in a).
There are several things different here:
(1) there are only two forces parallel to the ramp (the applied force is perpendicular to the ramp)
(2) the normal force is no longer simply mg cos 45.

Set up your equilibrium equation and solve for the applied force.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
14K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
9K
Replies
8
Views
3K