Can Greedy Coloring on Chordal Graph Complements Be Proven Optimal?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving the existence of a triangle-free k-chromatic graph for every positive integer k and the optimality of greedy coloring on the complements of chordal graphs. Participants express the complexity of using induction for these proofs, noting that graph theory often involves intricate arguments. There is a suggestion to explore subgraph arguments, similar to those in Kuratowski's theorem regarding planarity, to potentially contradict assumptions. The conversation highlights the challenges and nuances in proving these graph theory concepts. Overall, the need for clearer methodologies in addressing these problems is emphasized.
vshiro
does anyone have an idea on proving that there is a triangle-free k-chromatic graph for every positive integer k?

or, how to prove that given a simplicial ordering on a chordal graph G, running the greedy coloring algorithm on the reverse order gives the optimal coloring on the complement graph?

one might think to use induction but it's all very messy and ecchhh
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Usually the proofs in Graph theory have a quite messy appearence. I suggest you to have a look on Harary in order to see how boring it can be. And then I suggest that, if the assertions are true (I have not meditated about it), then try to use the subgraph argument, i.e., try to construct for the arbitrary case a subgraph that contradicts the assumption. See for example the Kuratowski theorem about planarity to see what I mean.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 125 ·
5
Replies
125
Views
20K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 114 ·
4
Replies
114
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
9K