Mosfet equation: how to get it?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Granger
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mosfet
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of the drain current dependence on the threshold voltage in a MOSFET circuit. The key equations involved include the gate voltage equation, the drain current equation in saturation, and the application of Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL). The critical point of confusion arises from the application of the chain rule in differentiation, specifically when transitioning from the equation for drain current to its derivative with respect to the threshold voltage. The correct approach involves recognizing that the drain current, I_D, is not constant during differentiation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of MOSFET operation and characteristics
  • Familiarity with Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL)
  • Proficiency in calculus, particularly differentiation and the chain rule
  • Knowledge of electrical circuit analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the MOSFET equations in detail
  • Learn about the application of the chain rule in calculus
  • Explore the impact of threshold voltage on MOSFET performance
  • Investigate different MOSFET configurations and their characteristics
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone involved in semiconductor device analysis will benefit from this discussion.

Granger
Messages
165
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


I'm studying the following circuit with a MOSFET

[![enter image description here][1]][1] [1]: https://i.stack.imgur.com/gEEdQ.png

Homework Equations


3. The Attempt at a Solution [/B]
Now for analyzing this circuit my book came out with various equations (which I totally understand and have no doubts about it).
Because the gate current is zero we have

$$V_G=V_{DD} \frac{R_2}{R_1+R_2}$$

Assuming the MOSFET is working on saturation we also have

$$I_D=k(V_{GS}-V_t)^2$$

And applying KVL:

$$V_{GS}=V_G-R_SI_D$$

Substituting equation (3) on equation (2) we have

$$I_D=k(V_G-R_SI_D -V_t)^2$$Now comes to the point I'm not understanding. To show us the dependence of the drain current over the threshold voltage, the book takes the derivative of the expression:

$$\frac{dI_D}{dV_t}=\frac{d}{dV_t}k(V_G-R_SI_D -V_t)^2$$

and then it writes

$$\frac{dI_D}{dV_t}=\frac{-2\sqrt{kI_D}}{1+2R_S\sqrt{kI_D}}$$

How on Earth did they go from equation (5) to equation (6) by taking the derivative. What kind of substitution are they making?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you try differentiating as indicated for the right hand side of your second-last equation? What do you get?
 
NascentOxygen said:
Did you try differentiating as indicated for the right hand side of your second-last equation? What do you get?

I get
$$-2k(V_G - R_SI_D-V_t)$$
 
Reminder: the chain rule says dy/dx =dy/dz * dz/dx

You have written the equivalent of dy/dz, and now need to multiply by the equivalent of dz/dx
 
NascentOxygen said:
Reminder: the chain rule says dy/dx =dy/dz * dz/dx

You have written the equivalent of dy/dz, and now need to multiply by the equivalent of dz/dx

What do you mean? Why using the chain rule here? I'm supposed to take the derivative of I_D in relation to V_t and that's exactly what I'm taking.
 
If you aren't confident in use of the chain rule, you can instead expand the squared term, i.e., get rid of the brackets on the right hand side, before attempting the differentiation. (This is a good way to check that you are going about it correctly, because obviously both methods should give identical answers.)
 
NascentOxygen said:
If you aren't confident in use of the chain rule, you can instead expand the squared term, i.e., get rid of the brackets on the right hand side, before attempting the differentiation. (This is a good way to check that you are going about it correctly, because obviously both methods should give identical answers.)

Oh I got what I was doing wrong!
I was assuming the current I_D was constant when taking the derivative which is obviously wrong. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K