Most important piece of scientific knowledge

  • Thread starter tade
  • Start date
488
14
In Six Easy Pieces, Richard Feynman said

If, in some cataclysm, all of scientific knowledge were to be destroyed, and only one sentence passed on to the next generation of creatures, what statement would contain the most information in the fewest words?

I believe it is the atomic hypothesis that all things are made of atoms.

In that one sentence, you will see, there is an enormous amount of information about the world, if just a little imagination and thinking are applied.

If such a cataclysm actually occurred, and you could preserve just one piece of scientific knowledge for a future race, what would it be?
 
33,458
9,191
I would try to preserve knowledge about scientific methods - with that, you can discover the existence of atoms again.
It is useless to know about atoms, if you have no reasonable way to do science, and the development of the scientific method took way longer than the discovery of atoms.
If knowledge about the scientific method is free, I think atoms are a good choice. The study of those atoms will eventually lead to subatomic processes and quantum mechanics.
 

phyzguy

Science Advisor
4,328
1,312
I suggest the most important idea is captured in Galileo's famous quote, which I have seen paraphrased as,

"The book of nature is written in the language of mathematics."
 

256bits

Gold Member
2,856
918
If the next generation of creatures is as technologically simple as a cave man, then to give him his start on the way to investigation and discovery I would just give them something simple as the Pythagorean theorem, and with time hopefully they could expand upon it to invent mathematics and geometry, which would be more useful to them than atomic theory could ever be at their level of knowledge.

Feyman speaks to an audience already versed in science and technology, those who do not need much, if any, explanation of the point he is trying to bring across. His statements are most reflective upon our present state of knowledge and how far we have progressed to understand the world in which we live.
 
488
14
Thanks for the interesting and on-point responses guys.
 
102
0
If such a cataclysm actually occurred, and you could preserve just one piece of scientific knowledge for a future race, what would it be?
Actually it's quite a coincidence but I answered the question to myself before I read the post and answered it in the same way that Feynman did.
 
488
14
Actually it's quite a coincidence but I answered the question to myself before I read the post and answered it in the same way that Feynman did.
Great minds think alike? Haha.

Sorry about getting banned.
 

FlexGunship

Gold Member
367
8
All of reality is logarithmic and humans can only observe the must mundane middle points.

EDIT: My hope would be that this might prevent some of the more extraordinary claims of religion from cropping up again (assuming they were also destroyed by this hypothetical cataclysm).
 

FlexGunship

Gold Member
367
8
Sorry, I don't understand what you mean.
As a species we're very poor at understanding scope. Visible light is the smallest part of the electromagnetic spectrum. Our tallest mountains are dwarfed by those on other planets. A tiny grain of sand has 1020 atoms in it; more than all the humans that have ever lived (or might EVER live). The distance a human will walk in his lifetime is trivial compared to the closest cosmological bodies.

To our species: far, close, fast, many, tall, big, hot, cold, slow, small, a short time, and a long time are ridiculously infantile descriptions.

A campfire is hot in a trivial way.
A field is big in a trivial way.
Cheetahs are fast in a trivial way.
Seasons are long in a trivial way.
A mountain is tall in a trivial way.
There are a lot of trees in a forest in a trivial way.

Et cetera...
 
488
14
As a species we're very poor at understanding scope. Visible light is the smallest part of the electromagnetic spectrum. Our tallest mountains are dwarfed by those on other planets. A tiny grain of sand has 1020 atoms in it; more than all the humans that have ever lived (or might EVER live). The distance a human will walk in his lifetime is trivial compared to the closest cosmological bodies.

Et cetera...
I think that is a very good point too. :smile:
 

jim hardy

Science Advisor
Gold Member
2018 Award
Dearly Missed
9,813
4,875
If such a cataclysm actually occurred, and you could preserve just one piece of scientific knowledge for a future race, what would it be?
I'd want a 1950-ish slide rule. It contains most of the math that was known until, well, whenever they became fluent with transcendentals.

It'd also make a good conversation starter should aliens land. :)
 
488
14
I'd want a 1950-ish slide rule. It contains most of the math that was known until, well, whenever they became fluent with transcendentals.

It'd also make a good conversation starter should aliens land. :)
Cool. What does it look like?
 

epenguin

Homework Helper
Gold Member
3,548
649
I would say the idea of atoms is not very helpful, they would not know what to do with it and it took 2 millenia at least after the first intuition to get anywhere with it. So I would tell them everything is made up of tiny bits of electricity, what you can see when you comb a cat etc. That would be really useful because it is a just noticeable but seemingly quite minor unimportant phenomenon - so telling them it is the Secret Of The Universe is giving them some really useful information. Once they started taking it seriously in a century they had really moved things.

Alternatively I would give them some instructions on how to make clear glass. In biology and astronomy that opens whole new worlds literally, in physics you get spectra, interference etc., chemistry would be a whole lot slower if you could never see anything happening inside a vessel, and it is so convenient we use it without thinking even when sometimes we could use something else.
 
488
14
I would say the idea of atoms is not very helpful, they would not know what to do with it and it took 2 millenia at least after the first intuition to get anywhere with it. So I would tell them everything is made up of tiny bits of electricity, what you can see when you comb a cat etc. That would be really useful because it is a just noticeable but seemingly quite minor unimportant phenomenon - so telling them it is the Secret Of The Universe is giving them some really useful information. Once they started taking it seriously in a century they had really moved things.
That would definitely be more practical, though I'm not too concerned with practicality.


Alternatively I would give them some instructions on how to make clear glass. In biology and astronomy that opens whole new worlds literally, in physics you get spectra, interference etc., chemistry would be a whole lot slower if you could never see anything happening inside a vessel, and it is so convenient we use it without thinking even when sometimes we could use something else.
Yeah, someone else suggested teaching them fire too, like Prometheus. :smile: We need fire before we can have glass.
 
456
8
Scientific knowledge.
First
Your right hand is to the right and your left hand is to the left. Very confusing concept.And it might be 'just a theory'.
Second
You can kill animals with pointy stuff then eat them.(people are animals too)
Third.
The Cartesian Coordinate system.
 
128
0
While I like the idea of passing on the scientific method, there's something even more fundamental that I'd like to pass on (and something which addresses what I consider to be the biggest flaw in the human psyche):

"It requires competence to recognize competence; be wary of those who only sound competent - ask them for proof."
 
488
14
Your right hand is to the right and your left hand is to the left. Very confusing concept.And it might be 'just a theory'.

You can kill animals with pointy stuff then eat them.(people are animals too)
Many of you focus on practicalities which is not what I'm really concerned with. And cannibalism?



Third.
The Cartesian Coordinate system.
This is what I'm looking for. great.
 

epenguin

Homework Helper
Gold Member
3,548
649
Cool. What does it look like?
:rofl:

mnyah mnyah, there are people here, young fellow, who can remember astounding their classmates with this magic thing that could calculate these tedious divisions in a trice!

It was considered the badge of the engineer.

Some memorable recommendable sliderule things and moments:

a Harold Lloyd film where the young genius with all the innocent genius defects wins any prize by calculating with his sliderule;

the moment in When Worlds Collide, a film that came just before The Forbidden Planet and is a better film IMHO but you hardly ever see it, when the Chief Scientist throws his sliderule on the table in anger;

the autobiog 'Slide Rule' by Neville Shute, who before becoming a novellist was an engineer who worked on the doomed R101 airship, the British Hindenburg disaster, and other plane ventures in the (too) small world of pre-WW2 British aviation, De Havilland etc., fascinating.

I'm sure others could add examples like that.
 
Last edited:
488
14
While I like the idea of passing on the scientific method, there's something even more fundamental that I'd like to pass on (and something which addresses what I consider to be the biggest flaw in the human psyche):

"It requires competence to recognize competence; be wary of those who only sound competent - ask them for proof."
Been arguing with one too many cranks? :smile:

The second part is kinda obvious, the first part really strikes me. "It requires competence to recognize competence"
 
488
14
:rofl:

mnyah mnyah, there are people here, young fellow, who can remember astounding their classmates with this magic thing that could calculate these tedious divisions in a trice!

It was considered the badge of the engineer.

Some memorable recommendable sliderule things and moments:

a Harold Lloyd film where the young genius with all the innocent genius defects wins any prize by calculating with his sliderule;

the moment in When Worlds Collide, a film that came just before The Forbidden Planet and is a better film IMHO but you hardly ever see it, when the Chief Scientist throws his sliderule on the table in anger;

the autobiog 'Slide Rule' by Neville Shute, who before becoming a novellist was an engineer who worked on the doomed R101 airship, the British Hindenburg disaster, and other plane ventures in the (too) small world of pre-WW2 British aviation, fascinating.

I'm sure others could add examples like that.
Haha. Sorry man, times change.
 
1,349
89
The definition for length & time; i.e. the constant c

what more could anyone want to know? :smile:

SR fan here

As was said before the "scientific method" would be the best one I think. What a ridicules amount of time for it to come about, or for the "belief" side to back -off.
 

Related Threads for: Most important piece of scientific knowledge

Replies
19
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
17
Views
23K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
694
  • Last Post
2
Replies
41
Views
8K
Replies
8
Views
9K
Replies
18
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Top