Most misunderstood physics concept

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Concept Physics
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the most misunderstood concepts in physics, with a focus on quantum mechanics (QM) and relativity, as well as classical physics. Participants highlight common misconceptions held by the general public, students, and even physicists. Key points include misunderstandings surrounding relativity, such as time dilation and event horizons, and QM concepts like wave function collapse and the Copenhagen interpretation. Classical physics also presents challenges, particularly with Newton's laws, where many believe continuous force is needed to maintain motion, and confusion between energy and power persists, even among professionals. Other frequently mentioned topics include the Big Bang theory, entropy, and the nature of light and mass. The conversation emphasizes the importance of clear communication in physics education to combat these widespread misconceptions.
  • #61
Two items come to mind:

1. For the "Average Joe," I suggest the atom whirl symbol which falsely depicts electrons as merely particles orbiting.
upload_2017-4-25_20-49-55.jpeg

2. That straight lines exist.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
A lot of the stuff you guys are talking about goes over my head and I'm graduating with my BS in physics in a couple of weeks. I'm not the greatest student but I am going to grad school. I guess that's just a sign that I need to work harder.
 
  • #63
PhDeezNutz said:
A lot of the stuff you guys are talking about goes over my head and I'm graduating with my BS in physics in a couple of weeks. I'm not the greatest student but I am going to grad school. I guess that's just a sign that I need to work harder.

Going into grad school thinking you don't understand anything is probably the best way to start out. :D
 
  • #64
Greg Bernhardt said:
What do you think is the most misunderstood concept in physics and why? I'm guessing it's something in QM or relativity, but maybe somewhere else?
Hi Greg,
This is my first ever post on a Physics Forum.
For me the thing I have most difficulty understanding is quantum entanglement.
Is it at all possible that the two particles could in fact be just a single particle?
I like the spinning coin analogy that says if you observe on side of the coin as 'heads', the other side must be 'tails'
The moment you observe the qualities of one particle, you instantly know the qualities of the other.
But could it be that the two entangled particles were really only one particle with opposite qualities?
The quantum world is so strange it seems that almost anything is possible.
 
  • #65
Bandersnatch said:
And to stay on topic, for the most misunderstood concept, I nominate Big Bang. It seems especially prone to breeding misplaced sense of understanding both in laymen and in people who should know better. I blame the name.
Fred Hoyle is still causing problems with Big Bang 60 years after he derisively named the concept...:biggrin:
 
  • #66
entropy.
 
  • #67
John Robert Manley said:
Is it at all possible that the two particles could in fact be just a single particle?
No.
You can even entangle completely different things, like an atom and a photon.
 
  • #68
In fact, if your friend observes a particle, she will then be entangled with the particle, and you can find out the state of the particle simply by asking your friend.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
925
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
344
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
887
Replies
3
Views
2K