Some lines from the book "Ideas and Opnions" by Albert Einstein

In summary, Einstein states in his book Ideas and Opinions that knowledge is derived from observations of physical things and then improved upon through reasoning and forming opinions. He also mentions the concept of "working-over," which means spending time improving something. He gives an example of working on one's fitness. Additionally, he suggests that concepts can be justified through observations, such as the concept of negative numbers being related to being in debt. However, the speaker questions whether this is a complete thought or if there is more context provided by Einstein. They also mention their own interpretation of the lines, which may not align with the intended meaning. Ultimately, the speaker finds this concept to be obvious and not particularly profound.
  • #1
Rishabh Narula
61
5
I read these lines from the book Ideas and
Opinions by Albert Einstein-
"Gradually the conviction gained recognition
that all knowledge about things is exclusively
a working-over of the raw material furnished by
the senses."

what I interpret from is that knowledge is
obtained by observing physical things(things
that can be observed by the senses) and thinking about it,
forming opinions,reasoning about it.Improving
on it basically.
Is my interpretation right?
what exactly does working-over mean here?
I know that working on something means-
to spend time repairing or improving something
for eg. His dancing technique is good,
but he needs to work on his fitness.
Does working-over here has similar meaning?

Also I do think,currently,that there are
observations justifying concepts too.
like the concept of negative numbers
can be related to being in debt.
Is it right to think so?If not,please give
some examples.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Is this a complete thought or did he also give some context? My English is not as good as I thought or I am simply off the required wavelength.
 
  • Like
Likes Rishabh Narula
  • #3
nuuskur said:
Is this a complete thought or did he also give some context? My English is not as good as I thought or I am simply off the required wavelength.
Mostly what I interpreted,few lines are from the book before I go on too my own interpretation of it.after what i interpret.
 
  • #4
OK, my translation: insentient beings lack knowledge.
I guess I don't see why this is profound, it seems obvious to me.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
8K
Replies
43
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top