Most Probable energy after infinite square well expands

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the most probable energy of a quantum particle in an infinite square well that expands from a width of 'a' to '2a'. The wave function solutions are derived from the Schrödinger equation, leading to the energy levels defined by the formula En = n2π2ħ2/(2ma2). The participant concludes that the most probable energy corresponds to the ground state of the expanded well, yielding a probability of P = 64/(9π2). The discussion highlights the confusion arising from different coordinate systems affecting the perceived energy probabilities, emphasizing the non-translational invariance of the system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Schrödinger wave equation
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics concepts such as wave functions and energy levels
  • Knowledge of normalization conditions in quantum mechanics
  • Basic grasp of integrals and probability calculations in quantum systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of wave function normalization in quantum mechanics
  • Study the effects of boundary conditions on wave functions in infinite potential wells
  • Investigate the concept of translational invariance in quantum systems
  • Learn about the mathematical techniques for solving the Schrödinger equation for different potentials
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, physicists analyzing potential wells, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum energy states.

dark_matter_is_neat
Messages
34
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Consider an infinite square well in one dimension extending from -a/2 to a/2. A particle of mass m is sitting in the ground state. At time t = 0 the size of the well doubles so it now goes from -a to a. If one then measures the energy, what is the most probable result and what is its probability.
Relevant Equations
E##\Psi(x)## = ##-\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m}\frac{\partial^{2} \Psi(x)}{\partial x^{2}}##
For wave function of the initial well:
##\Psi(\frac{a}{2}) = \Psi(-\frac{a}{2}) = 0##
For the wave function of the final square well:
##\Psi(a) = \Psi(-a) = 0##
Going through the Schrödinger wave equation, ##-\frac{2mE}{\hbar^{2}}\Psi(x) = \frac{\partial^{2} \Psi(x)}{\partial x^{2}}##, so ##Psi(x) = C_{1}sin(\frac{\sqrt{2mE}}{\hbar}x) + C_{2}cos(\frac{\sqrt{2mE}}{\hbar}x)##.
Enforcing the boundary conditions:
##cos(\frac{\sqrt{2mE}}{\hbar} \frac{a}{2}) = 0##, so ##\frac{\sqrt(2mE)}{\hbar} \frac{a}{2} = n \frac{\pi}{2}## for odd n.
##sin(\frac{\sqrt{2mE}}{\hbar} \frac{a}{2}) = 0##, so ##\frac{\sqrt(2mE)}{\hbar} \frac{a}{2} = n \pi ##.
So this leads to:
##\Psi(x) = C_{2}cos(\frac{n \pi x}{a})## for odd n
##\Psi(x) = C_{1}sin(\frac{n \pi x}{a})## for even n
##E_{n} = \frac{n^{2}\pi^{2}\hbar^{2}}{2 m a^{2}}##
Enforcing normalization, ##C_{1} = C_{2} = \sqrt{\frac{2}{a}}##.

The wave function for the expanded well is identical except you replace a with 2a.

My first thought for what would be the most probable energy, was the energy of the ground state of the initial square well, ##\frac{\pi^{2} \hbar^{2}}{2 m a^{2}}## which corresponds to the n = 2 state for the widened well , however when I calculate this probability I get:
P = ##|\int^{\frac{a}{2}}_{-\frac{a}{2}} \frac{\sqrt{2}}{a} cos(\frac{\pi x}{a}) sin(\frac{\pi x}{a}) dx|^{2}## which is obviously 0.

I believe the actual most probable energy is the ground state energy of the new well, which has probability:
P = ##|\int^{\frac{a}{2}}_{-\frac{a}{2}} \frac{\sqrt{2}}{a} cos(\frac{\pi x }{a}) cos(\frac{\pi x}{2a}) dx|^{2}## = ##\frac{64}{9 \pi^{2}}##
Which I've checked against the probabilities for n>1 up to n = 3 and it had the highest probability.

What confuses me about this answer is if I were to look at a physically identical well that instead starts at 0 (so the first well would go from 0 to a and the widened well would go from 0 to 2a), I would get that the probability of E = ##\frac{\pi^{2} \hbar^{2}}{2ma^{2}}## to be non-zero and in fact be the most probable energy.

These to wells are identical, I just changed my coordinate system, but I end up getting two different results for the most probable energy. I find this really strange, shouldn't the system be translationally invariant? What is going on here? Did I just make a mistake in my calculations or is there something else I'm not seeing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Never mind I realize that the two wells I'm comparing are different. The well the expansion of a well going from 0 to a to 0 to 2a is different than a well expanding from -a/2 to a/2 to -a to a, since in the first situation the well is just expanding rightwards while in the second situation the well is expanding both leftwards and rightwards.

It's still interesting how the probabilities change depending on how you expand the well.
 
Think classically. It takes (or maybe recovers) energy to expand a well when there is a particle bouncing around inside it. There is no guarantee that this energy is the same when the particle is in different places when the expansion occurs.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dark_matter_is_neat

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K