Motion in a Magnetic Field and TV

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the magnetic field strength required to deflect an electron beam in a black and white TV's picture tube. The beam is accelerated through a 50 kV potential difference and travels through a 1 cm wide magnetic field. The initial calculations yield a magnetic field strength of 0.18 T, while the textbook solution indicates a value of 70 mT. The discrepancy arises from the different approaches to calculating the radius of curvature and the effective length of the magnetic field's influence.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics, specifically Newton's laws of motion.
  • Familiarity with electromagnetism, particularly the Lorentz force equation.
  • Knowledge of kinematics, including equations of motion for constant acceleration.
  • Basic proficiency in algebra and trigonometry for solving equations and manipulating variables.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Lorentz force equation and its applications in magnetic fields.
  • Learn about the motion of charged particles in magnetic fields, focusing on radius of curvature calculations.
  • Explore the relationship between potential difference, kinetic energy, and velocity in charged particle motion.
  • Investigate the effects of magnetic field strength on the trajectory of electron beams in CRT technology.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators, and engineers working with cathode ray tube technology will benefit from this discussion.

MickOtto
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The Picture tube in an old black and white TV uses magnetic deflection coils rather than electric plates. Suppose an electron beam is accelerated from rest through a 50kV potential difference and then through a region with uniform magnetic field 1cm wide. The screen is located 10cm from the coils and is 50cm wide. When the field is off, the electron beam hits the centre of the screen. Ignoring relativistic corrections, what field magnitude is needed to deflect the beam to the side of the screen.

m_e = 9.11E-31 kg;
q_e = 1.6E-19 C;
delta V = 50E3 V;
d_1 = 0.01m
d_2 = 0.1m
d_3 = 0.5m

Homework Equations



F = qv x B = qvBsin(theta) = qvB (assuming the magnetic field is at right angles);
1/2mv^2 = q*deltaV;
F = ma;
v_f = v_i + at;
v=d/t

The Attempt at a Solution



I will say the velocity from the potential difference is positive x and screen to be in the yz plane. I also assume the magnetic field is pointed in the positive z direction, giving the velocity from magnetic field in the y direction.


First I got the velocity from potential difference.

1/2mv^2=qV
=> v = sqrt(2q_eV/m_e)

Then I worked out the velocity in y from magnetic field, I'll call this v'.

F = qvB = ma
=> a=qvB/m.
v'_f = v'_i + at v'_i = 0;
v'_f = at =qvBd_1/mv = qBd_1/m_e (using t = d_1/v)

Now, time taken for beam to travel 0.1m in x is

t = d/v = 0.1/sqrt(2q_eV/m_e) = 7.5E-10

Beam must travel d_3/2 = 0.25m in this time, so v' = d/t becomes

0.25/7.5E-10 = 3.3E8.

We have v' = qBd_1/m_e.

Rearranging I got

B = m_e v/q_e d_1.

Plugging in numbers I get B =0.18 T.

The answer the book gives is 70 mT.





In the solutions the book works out R as a radius of curvature from Pythagorus and uses qvB=mv^2/R. My problem with this is that the magnetic field only exists for 0.01m, not 0.1m which is what they use.


Any help/pointing out the obvious and making me feel like an idiot will be greatly appreciated.


Thanks,
Michael.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, I see what they do in the solutions now.

They use trig and get R for the magnetic field (giving it value 1.08cm) the use qvB=mv^2/R, solve for B and get the answer. I know my way is a lot messier than that, but why doesn't it work?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K