Motorcycle: Flywheel mass and rear wheel torque

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the impact of flywheel mass on the torque at the rear wheel of two identical motorcycles, with one having a flywheel twice the mass of the other. Participants explore the relationship between flywheel inertia, engine torque, and the resulting torque at the rear wheel during acceleration and at constant speed.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that a heavier flywheel will result in less torque available at the rear wheel during acceleration because more energy is required to accelerate the flywheel itself.
  • Another participant references Newton's second law of motion in its rotational form, stating that the torque from the engine must overcome both the torque at the wheel and the torque needed to accelerate the flywheel.
  • It is noted that if the motorcycle is traveling at a constant speed, the torque at the rear wheel would be equal for both flywheels since no additional energy is needed to maintain speed.
  • A later reply argues that the torque applied to the rear contact patch should remain the same for both flywheels, emphasizing the direct link between engine force and rear wheel torque, while acknowledging that the heavier flywheel affects the acceleration due to increased inertia.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the torque at the rear wheel will be different between the two motorcycles, particularly during acceleration. Some argue that the heavier flywheel reduces available torque, while others contend that the rear wheel torque remains the same despite the flywheel's mass.

Contextual Notes

The discussion involves assumptions about the relationship between flywheel mass, engine torque, and vehicle acceleration, as well as the effects of constant speed versus acceleration scenarios. The implications of increased linear inertia due to the heavier flywheel are also considered.

Alwaysmore2learn
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Flywheel mass and rear wheel torque
Hello, I made this account to ask this question that I’ve been loosing sleep over.

My question is say you have 2 identical motorcycles the engine the exact same and everything the only difference is the mass of the flywheel one bikes engine has a flywheel twice the mass as the other will the torque at the rear wheel of the one with the heavier flywheel be lower?

My thinking is force from the engine is used to accelerate the flywheel so there will be less torque at the rear wheel compared to the one with the lighter flywheel. My knowledge in physics is lacking in simply just a motorcycle obsessed being who enjoys the physics of motorcycles, but can someone please give me a answer and explain to me what’s going on?

I know that the engine with the heavier fly wheel will accelerate slower and that it will store energy in the form of inertia but I simply want to know if the torque at rear wheel will be different thank you guys for taking the time to read this and hopefully answer my questions in detail I can’t tell you how many hours of thought I’ve put into it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

It all depends on the acceleration. When the bike accelerates there will be less torque available at the drive wheel because more energy must be diverted to accelerate the heavier flywheel.

If traveling at a fixed speed, energy will go to overcome wind resistance and friction. No energy is needed to keep a flywheel of any weight spinning at a fixed speed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Alwaysmore2learn and Lnewqban
The basis for this is Newton's second law of motion, ##T=I\alpha## in its rotational form.

Let's say you have a flywheel with inertia ##I_f## and angular acceleration ##\alpha_f##. There is a torque ##T_e## coming for the engine and a torque ##T_w## coming from the wheel. Then:
$$T_e - T_w = I_f\alpha_f$$
Or:
$$T_e = T_w + I_f\alpha_f$$
So if you are going at a constant velocity (even considering at rest), as soon it will accelerate against the wheel reactive torque, you will need a greater torque coming from the engine as you suspected.

As @Baluncore said, if the velocity is constant, ##\alpha_f## is ##0##, therefore the wheel torque and the engine torque are opposite and equal.

But if the wheel torque is increasing (say, the motorcycle begins to go up a hill) and the flywheel is decelerating, then ##\alpha_f## becomes negative and the engine torque needed is less the the wheel torque. This is when the energy stored in the flywheel during the acceleration is released.

Also, on a moving vehicle, the simple weight addition of the flywheel adds to the total mass of the vehicle, therefore increasing the vehicle's linear inertia (##m## in ##F=ma##). This will also contribute to affect the acceleration of the whole vehicle.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Alwaysmore2learn and Lnewqban
Alwaysmore2learn said:
...
I know that the engine with the heavier fly wheel will accelerate slower and that it will store energy in the form of inertia but I simply want to know if the torque at rear wheel will be different thank you guys for taking the time to read this and hopefully answer my questions in detail I can’t tell you how many hours of thought I’ve put into it.
The torque or rearward force applied on the rear contact patch should be the same for both flywheels.
There is a direct link between the expanding force in the combustion chamber and the rear wheel (think of the gears and sprockets as a lever of same length for both cases).
The ability of that torque to accelerate the bike will be restrained by the reduced rotational speed of the rear wheel, in the case of the heavier flywheel (think of same engine having to accelerate a bike with greater rotational and linear inertias).

 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tiago Carita

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K