- 23,709
- 5,927
If I understand your question correctly, you are asking why the dot product of the velocity vector with itself is equal to the square of its magnitude. Is that correct?Macykc2 said:I was going to create a whole new thread with reference to this post, but I guess I should check if this will bump it.
My question lies in posts 2 and 3, I understand where we get the velocity function in terms of cylindrical cords, but I'm missing the bridge between the v2 part, why is it "concluded" that we use that equation?