Moving frame in a magnetic field

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a quadratic frame placed in a magnetic field, where the frame's vertices are pulled to flatten it. Participants are tasked with finding the charge that passes through the frame, given specific parameters such as the magnetic field strength, resistance, and speed of movement.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the role of speed in the problem, with some suggesting it does not affect the total charge, while others express uncertainty about how to incorporate it. There are attempts to derive relationships between current, charge, and area, with various interpretations of the equations involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with multiple interpretations being explored. Some participants have offered insights into the mathematical relationships, while others question the assumptions made in the analysis. There is no explicit consensus on the final answer, and the conversation reflects a mix of agreement and differing viewpoints on the approach to the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem does not explicitly ask for the current, only for the charge, which leads to discussions about the relevance of certain variables. There is also mention of potential errors in reasoning related to the geometry of the frame and the changing velocities involved.

kaspis245
Messages
189
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A quadratic frame which has an edge of ##a=10 cm##, was put inside a magnetic field ##B=0.01T##. The frame's opposite vertices were being pulled with a uniform speed ##v=1mm/s## until the frame became flat. Find the charge that passed through the frame. The plane of the frame remained perpendicular to the magnetic field all the time, the resistance of the frame equals ##R=5Ω##.

Untitled.png


Homework Equations


##ε=vLB##
##I=\frac{q}{t}##
##ε=IR##

The Attempt at a Solution


Here's my try:
olimpas_5.jpg

Clearly the answer I get is incorrect, because ##v## does not appear in the final formula. How should I approach this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I wouldn't v to appear in the final formula. Closing it faster increases the current but decreases time in the same way. Also, I don't think there is a way to get the units right with speed in the final answer.
You can insert the known value for the angle to simplify the final answer a bit.

How did you find I? I would expect that you have to calculate some derivative for it.
The vertical velocity indicated in the sketch starts with v, but it changes over time.
 
In line with mfb I not only agree that total charge Q is not a function of v but that that fact can be used to get the answer in a jiffy!
 
I must use ##v## since it is given in my problem. There has to be some use of it.

I used this formula to find I:
##I=\frac{ε}{\frac{R}{4}}##

I see that ##v## direction changes over time so this means that ##ε## also changes. I don't know which velocity I should be interested in: vertical or horizontal?

mfb said:
The vertical velocity indicated in the sketch starts with v, but it changes over time.
I've denoted in my drawing that the top vertex of the triangle will be moving downwards with a uniform velocity ##v##. Are you saying that this velocity will change over time?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU
kaspis245 said:
I must use ##v## since it is given in my problem. There has to be some use of it.
It indeed has a function in this exercise: to make you understand it doesn't play a role. To distract you, so to say.

Note that the exercise doesn't ask for the current, but only for the charge. Now ##q = \int i\; dt## and ##i## does depend on v, but the integral only on the integral of v.
 
The horizontal speed is constant but the vertical one is not. It is possible to find the current as function of time and integrate it, but it is not necessary. This will become easier to see once you find the right formula for the current. Think about the area...
 
kaspis245 said:
I must use ##v## since it is given in my problem. There has to be some use of it.
The instructor ORDERED you to use it? Merkwuerdig, as they say in Germany and in the movie Dr. Strangelove ...
This problem is easily solvable in your head.
Current and v are not parameters to be concerned with. Just Farady's law, integrated.
BvU's post #5 is right-on!
 
Ah, math is my weak spot. Please check if this is correct:

##ε=\frac{dΦ}{dt}##
##Φ=\int B⋅dA=B⋅\int dA=B⋅\int_{π/4}^{π/2} \frac{(acosθ)^2}{2}=-\frac{Ba^2}{2}##
##q=\frac{16Φ}{R}=\frac{8Ba^2}{R}##
 
rude man said:
The instructor ORDERED you to use it? Merkwuerdig, as they say in Germany and in the movie Dr. Strangelove ...
This problem is easily solvable in your head.
Current and v are not parameters to be concerned with. Just Farady's law, integrated.
kaspis245 said:
Ah, math is my weak spot. Please check if this is correct:

##ε=\frac{dΦ}{dt}##
good.
##Φ=\int B⋅dA=B⋅\int dA=B⋅\int_{π/4}^{π/2} \frac{(acosθ)^2}{2}=-\frac{Ba^2}{2}##
bad. What is θ? There's no need for any θ. And where is the differential? Every integral has to have a differential.
I can only repeat my previous hint: integrate faraday's law: emf = -dΦ/dt.
You should seriously review your basic calculus. You're too far into physics not to have the necessary math tools at hand.
 
  • #10
Ok, let's do it in small steps. Is it correct:

##ε=-\frac{dΦ}{dt}=-B\frac{dA}{dt}##
 
  • #11
That is a good start.
 
  • #12
Then, I need to find ##\frac{dA}{dt}##.

Snapshot.jpg

##x=\frac{a}{\sqrt{2}}##
From the triangle, I can say that it's area ##A=\frac{(x-vt)(x+vt)}{2}=\frac{x^2-(vt)^2}{2}=\frac{a^2-2(vt)^2}{4}##.

Then, ##\frac{dA}{dt}=\frac{d}{dt}[\frac{a^2-2(vt)^2}{4}]=-v^2t##

Therefore, ##ε=Bv^2t##

##\frac{q}{t}=\frac{4Bv^2t}{\frac{R}{4}}=\frac{16Bv^2t}{R}##

##q=\frac{16Bv^2t^2}{R}##

##t=\frac{\frac{a}{\sqrt{2}}}{v}##

##q=\frac{8Ba^2}{R}##
 
  • #13
Hello kaspis245

I might be wrong but I think your analysis is not correct . The relation ##x=\frac{a}{\sqrt{2}}## doesn't seem reasonable.

I believe the answer should be ##q=\frac{Ba^2}{R}##
 
  • #14
kaspis245 said:
Then, I need to find ##\frac{dA}{dt}##.
That is possible, but not necessary. It is better to integrate over time as early as possible.

In the sketch you fix the two shorter sides to have the same length. This is true in the initial setup but won't stay true. This is also the main reason your earlier analysis didn't give the right result.
 
  • #15
@rude man ,@mfb

Do you agree that ##q=\frac{Ba^2}{R}## should be the answer ?
 
  • #16
It is kaspis245's homework, he has to find the answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
16K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K