Multiple Measurements of a single Qubit

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the theoretical possibility of measuring a single qubit multiple times within the context of quantum mechanics, particularly in relation to No-Go Theorems such as the No-Communication-Theorem. Participants explore the implications of repeated measurements on qubit states and entanglement.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether it is theoretically possible to measure a qubit multiple times, noting that the first measurement collapses the superposition, which seems to contradict the No-Communication-Theorem.
  • Another participant asserts that multiple measurements can be performed but will affect the system, referencing the quantum Zeno effect.
  • It is proposed that entanglement only applies to the first measurement, after which qubits behave independently, leading to different outcomes based on the measurement basis used.
  • A participant challenges the idea of "fixing" a qubit in a state, stating that measurements change the state unless the state is an eigenstate of the observable being measured.
  • A participant clarifies that while a qubit can appear to be in a fixed state after measurement, it can still be changed by subsequent measurements, and acknowledges the clarification regarding entanglement.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of multiple measurements and the nature of entanglement. There is no consensus on the theoretical limitations regarding repeated measurements of a qubit.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the effects of measurement on qubit states and the implications for entanglement, but the limitations of their arguments and the assumptions underlying their claims remain unresolved.

Ruik
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi :-)

I'm working on my master thesis in the field of quantum theory; currently I investigante No-Go-Theorems like the No-Cloning, No-Deleting, No-Hiding, No-Communication-Theorems ans so on. There is a fundamental question which is somehow linked to the No-Communication-Theorem.

Is it - in theory - possible to measure one qubits multiple times?
Lets say, you have a qubit |q> = |+> = 0.5^0.5 * |0> + 0.5^0.5 * |1> and perform a measurement in the standard basis. With a probability of 0.5 the outcome of the measurement is |0>. Since the superpostition is destroyed now, the outcome of a second, third, fourth... measurement must be |0> as well. But is it even allowed to perform multiple measurements?
I'm aware that this might be difficult to realize, since photons are destroyed during a measurment. I'm wondering if the theory of quantum mechanics prohibits multiple measurements.

These are my thoughts which lead to a contradiction to the No-Communication-Theorem, so somewhere must be a mistake:
If I take a qubit |q> = |+> and perform a measurement in the |+>/|-> basis, the outcome would be |+> with probability 1. By doing this I fix the qubit in the state |+>. So if it would be possible to perform another measurement in the |0>/|1> basis I would get a random bit. And since |q> is fixed in the state |+>, every following measurement should producea random bit as well.
The No-Communication-Theorem says that it is impossible to communicate via entagled EPR-pairs, especially not faster than light. But if there would be a pair of entagled qubits - one on earth, one on Mars - and the first one is measured in either the |0>/|1> basis or the |+>/|-> basis, then the person on Mars would be able to find out which basis was used by performing multiple measurements in both basises; for one basis he always gets the same result, for the other basis he gets different results.

So... this is known to be impossible. Maybe the answer is just, that not even in theory it is possible to perform multiple measurements on one qubit, but I never heard or read about such a limitation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Of course you can measure several times. However, doing so will affect your system.
See e.g. the quantum Zeno effect.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ruik
The entanglement only applies to the first measurement you do. After that the qubits act independently again, so the |+>-vs-|-> basis measurement will kick the qubit into one of those values and keep returning it even if the other side used |0>-vs-|1> for their measurement.

You can even test whether or not your strategy would work. Go to this blog post, scroll down to the "Write Your Own Quantum Communication Strategy" section, and enter these strategies into the simulator widget:

Alice:
turn(X, 90)
measure()

Bob:
move = measure() != measure()

If Bob's measurements were differing based on what Alice did, you'd start winning the game more than 50% of the time.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ruik
Where did you get the notion of "fixing the qubit in a state"? This isn't compatible with the postulates of QM.

You can always perform a measurement such that your supposedly fixed state is not an eigenstate of the corresponding observable and therefore is changed by it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ruik
@kith: I meant, that after the measurement the qubit is definitely in the state |+> an not in some kind of a superposition. But you are right, its absolutely possible to change the state again, so its not really fixed.

What Strilanc wrote answers my question. I tought the entanglement would continue to exist, but it sounds logically that its not. So the guy on Mars only has a connection to the Earth qubit with the first measurement.

Thank you all for your answers!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 120 ·
5
Replies
120
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K