- #1

- 53

- 1

## Main Question or Discussion Point

Hi pf,

there was an article in the Stanford encyclopedia about QM that was rewritten.

it quoted a "multiprocess" interpretation differing from Everett's one which could be related to Bohm's interpretation. it is no more there.

i am wondering if there are interpretatins where different results for a unique measurement can coincide (like in Everett)

there was an article in the Stanford encyclopedia about QM that was rewritten.

it quoted a "multiprocess" interpretation differing from Everett's one which could be related to Bohm's interpretation. it is no more there.

i am wondering if there are interpretatins where different results for a unique measurement can coincide (like in Everett)