MHB Multiplication with binary unsigned numbers

shamieh
Messages
538
Reaction score
0
1111010 x 1001 is a negative * a negative so I should get a positive right?

which I got 0001001010.

BUT, if it's -122 x -9 = 1098. How come I get a positive number that doesn't equal 1098. Aren't you supposed to disregard the most left bit if it's more numbers than your original like wouldn't i disregard the 1 carry in 10001001010, because if I included it in the answer wouldn't that make it -122 * -9 which = -1098. And how is that possible.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
shamieh said:
1111010 x 1001 is a negative * a negative
Why are you saying that? First, are you talking about 2's complement? Second, what number of bits do you have? Only when you know the number of bits, you can say which numbers are negative in 2's complement: the leftmost bit must be 1. But the leftmost bit here means that you have to use all bits, even if this means leading zeros. For example, if you have 8 bits, then 1001 is 00001001, the leading bit is 0 and the number is positive.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top