Multiplicity of a Einstein Solid, Low Temperature Limit

In summary, we derived the formula for the multiplicity of an Einstein solid in the "high-temperature" limit and used the same methods to show that the multiplicity in the "low-temperature" limit is given by Ω(N,q) = (eN/q)^q. We then used the Taylor expansion to simplify the equation and found that Ω(N,q) = (eN/q)^q. Lastly, we found a formula for the temperature of an Einstein solid in the limit q << N and solved for the energy as a function of temperature to obtain U=Nϵe^(-ϵ/(k_B T)), where ε is the size of an energy unit.
  • #1
TFM
1,026
0

Homework Statement



(a)

The formula for the multiplicity of an Einstein solid in the “high-temperature” limit,
q >> N, was derived in one of the lectures. Use the same methods to show that the multiplicity of an Einstein solid in the “low-temperature” limit, q << N, is

Ω(N,q)=(eN/q)^q (When q≪N)


(b)

Find a formula for the temperature of an Einstein solid in the limit q << N. Solve for the energy as a function of temperature to obtain U=Nϵe^(-ϵ/(k_B T)), where ε is the size of an energy unit.


Homework Equations



N/A

The Attempt at a Solution



Okay, I have started (a):

[tex] \Omega (N,q) = (\frac{(N - 1 + q)!}{(n - 1)!q!}) [/tex]

N large:

(N - 1)! approx = N!

[tex] \Omega (N,q) = (\frac{(N + q)!}{N! q!}) [/tex]

Take logs

[tex] ln(\Omega (N,q)) = ln(N + q)! - ln(N!) - ln(q!) [/tex]

Use Stirling aprrox:

[tex] ln N! \approx N ln(N) - N [/tex]

[tex] ln(\Omega (N,q)) = (N + q)ln(N + q) - (N + q) - (Nln(N) - N) - (qln(q) - q) [/tex]

Cancels down to:

[tex] ln(\Omega (N,q)) = (N + q)ln(N + q) - Nln(N) - qln(q) [/tex]

Now I have to use the Taylor Expnasion for q << N, but I got slightly confused here.

Could anyone please offer some assistane what I need to do from here?

Many thanks in advance,

TFM
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
TFM said:
Cancels down to:

[tex] ln(\Omega (N,q)) = (N + q)ln(N + q) - Nln(N) - qln(q) [/tex]
TFM

You need to write the (N+q) log like this (below) and then just copy the lecture derivation, I think. You can show how you use the taylor expansion, but I would have said it's not neccessary

[tex]ln(N+q)=ln(N(1+q/N))[/tex]
 
  • #3
Okay, so now:

[tex] ln(\Omega (N,q)) = (N + q)ln(N + q) - Nln(N) - qln(q) [/tex]

Use Taylor Expansion:

[tex] ln(N+q)=ln(N(1+q/N)) [/tex]

[tex] ln(N+q)=ln(N) + ln(1+q/N)) [/tex]

now the notes say:

[tex] ln(N+q) = ln(N) + q/N [/tex]

Althought I am not sure why the last ln has dissapeared?

Now plug into omega to give:

[tex] ln(\Omega (N,q)) = (N + q)(ln(N) + q/N)- Nln(N) - qln(q) [/tex]

Multiply out:

[tex] ln(\Omega (N,q)) = NlnN + q + q^2/N + qlnN - Nln(N) - qln(q) [/tex]

Cancel down:

[tex] ln(\Omega (N,q)) = q + q^2/N + qlnN - qln(q) [/tex]

Now the notes have that:

because q >>N,

N^2/q approx 0

So for

because q <<N,

This should still be

q^2/N approx 0

thus:

[tex] ln(\Omega (N,q)) = q + qlnN - qln(q) [/tex]

take exponentials

[tex] \Omega (N,q) = e^q + (N/q)^q [/tex]

Thus

[tex] \Omega (N,q) = (eN/q)^q [/tex]

Does this look okay?
 
  • #4
TFM said:
Okay, so now:

[tex] ln(\Omega (N,q)) = (N + q)ln(N + q) - Nln(N) - qln(q) [/tex]

Use Taylor Expansion:

[tex] ln(N+q)=ln(N(1+q/N)) [/tex]

[tex] ln(N+q)=ln(N) + ln(1+q/N)) [/tex]

This is just rearranging (not using a Taylor series)

TFM said:
now the notes say:

[tex] ln(N+q) = ln(N) + q/N [/tex]

You should say, [tex] ln(N+q)=ln(N(1+q/N))=ln(N) + ln(1+q/N)[/tex]

You can then take the Taylor expansion of the last term in the above, namely
[tex]ln(1+q/N)[/tex], provided you assume q<<N so that q/N<<1. If you look up the Taylor expansion for ln(1+x) you will find that it says this is approximately equal to x in the limit x<<1.
TFM said:
[tex] ln(\Omega (N,q)) = q + qlnN - qln(q) [/tex]

take exponentials

[tex] \Omega (N,q) = e^q + (N/q)^q [/tex]

Here there is an error. When you exponentiate an equation the entire right side is raised to the same exponential. Also [tex]e^x+e^y \neq e^{x+y}[/tex]
 
  • #5
Okay so:

[tex] ln(\Omega (N,q)) = q + qlnN - qln(q) [/tex]

so I have to take exponentials,


[tex] \Omega (N,q) = e^q + e^qlnN - e^qln(q) [/tex]

[tex] \Omega (N,q) = e^q + Ne^q - qe^q [/tex]

So now do we use the log/exponential rules to give?

[tex] \Omega (N,q) = (eN/q)^q [/tex]

Also,

Find a formula for the temperature of an Einstein solid in the limit q << N. Solve for the energy as a function of temperature to obtain U=Nϵe^(-ϵ/(k_B T)), where ε is the size of an energy unit.

Where woul be aq good place to start for here?
 

FAQ: Multiplicity of a Einstein Solid, Low Temperature Limit

What is the multiplicity of an Einstein solid?

The multiplicity of an Einstein solid refers to the number of microstates or possible arrangements of energy levels for a system of N identical, non-interacting particles. In other words, it measures the number of ways that the particles can distribute their energy among different energy levels.

How is the multiplicity of an Einstein solid calculated?

The multiplicity, denoted by Ω, is calculated using the formula Ω = (q+N-1)!/(q!(N-1)!), where q is the total number of energy quanta (or units of energy) and N is the number of particles in the system. This formula takes into account the indistinguishability of particles and the fact that energy levels can be occupied by multiple particles.

What is the significance of the low temperature limit in the multiplicity of an Einstein solid?

The low temperature limit, also known as the classical limit, is the point at which the temperature of the system is much lower than the average energy per particle. At this point, the multiplicity of an Einstein solid approaches the classical value of Ω = (q+N-1)^N. This limit is important because it allows us to compare the behavior of the system at low temperatures to classical thermodynamics.

What is the physical interpretation of the multiplicity of an Einstein solid?

The multiplicity of an Einstein solid has a statistical interpretation. It represents the number of ways that the particles in the system can distribute their energy among different energy levels. This is important because it allows us to make predictions about the behavior of a large number of particles based on the statistical behavior of individual particles.

How does the multiplicity of an Einstein solid change with increasing number of particles?

The multiplicity of an Einstein solid increases with the number of particles in the system. This is because, as the number of particles increases, the number of possible energy level combinations also increases. In other words, the more particles there are, the more ways they can distribute their energy among different energy levels, resulting in a larger multiplicity.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
6K
Back
Top