Multiplying Complex Numbers: Understanding the Two Methods

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on evaluating the complex roots of the equation x^2 + 3x + 7, specifically the roots x = -2/3 ± i√19. The user encounters difficulties while trying to multiply the positive root using two different methods: distribution and the multiplication definition of complex numbers. Both methods yield results that should theoretically align, but discrepancies arise in the simplification process. A correction is noted regarding the correct roots derived from the quadratic formula, which should be x = -3/2 ± i√(19)/2. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurate calculations and understanding complex number multiplication.
Square1
Messages
143
Reaction score
1
Ok there is no way I am writing out all the work of this question using a keyboard, and my scanner chose today not to work ( yes, it chose to be an idiot and not work *VERY* grumpy face) so I can't upload a picture of my work. If I were to type out the following it think it would be very difficult to read SOOO I will try to make a description as friendly as possible.

I have the equation x^2 + 3x + 7
It has complex roots x = -2/3 + i√19 and x = -2/3 - i√19

I try evaluating these roots by plugging them back in. I try it two ways, and I am only trying out right now the positive root. I am having a problem already at the x^2 term.

THE PROBLEM:
To multiply the positive root by itself, I first try the "from the ground up" method of just distributing, and eventually making a substitution of -1 for i^2. After making that substitution, the point is that I end up subtracting the term that had the i^2, from 9/4. After simplifying, I have real component -10/4 and complex component (-6i√19)/4

The second way I try to evaluate x^2 term is by using the multiplication definition of complex numbers (a + bi)(c + di) = (ac - bd) + (bc + ad)i . This results in me ADDING the same kind of complex part to the same real part...and
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Both methods should work, everything you've computed so far is correct. If you add (3x+7) to what you've computed for x^2 you get 0.
 
Sorry i misclicked and posted before I was finished. The new thread is right above.
 
Square1 said:
I have the equation x^2 + 3x + 7
It has complex roots x = -2/3 + i√19 and x = -2/3 - i√19
Try -3/2 ± i√(19)/2
 
Why is this in number theory? By the way, like haruspex noticed, you are working with the wrong roots, by using the quadratic formula you should have got
\frac{-3}{2}\pm\frac{i\sqrt{19}}{2}

P.S. just practicing typing in latex
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
889
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K