Undergrad Multiplying Uncertainties in Different Units

Click For Summary
Multiplying quantities with different units while including uncertainties involves using the standard propagation of uncertainty formula. In the example of calculating impulse (I = Ft), the uncertainties in force (F) and time (t) can be combined using their partial derivatives. If the uncertainties are uncorrelated, the covariance term drops out, simplifying the calculation. The discussion emphasizes that when plugging in the values, the units will naturally align, confirming the correctness of the approach. Understanding how to compute partial differentials is essential for accurate uncertainty propagation in such calculations.
e2m2a
Messages
354
Reaction score
13
TL;DR
How do you multiply quantities with their uncertainties when the units are different?
I could not find any clear explanation on multiplying quantities with different units while including their uncertainties. For example, how would you compute the following product with their uncertainties? 3.4 Newtons +/- .12 Newtons x 1.7 seconds +/- .23 seconds
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You treat it the same as any other uncertainty. You have the formula ##f(F,t)=F \ t## so according to the standard propagation of uncertainty $$\sigma^2_f=\left( \frac{\partial f}{\partial F} \right)^2 \sigma^2_F + \left( \frac{\partial f}{\partial t} \right)^2 \sigma^2_t + 2 \frac{\partial f}{\partial F} \frac{\partial f}{\partial t} \sigma_{Ft}$$

Notice that the units work out naturally.
 
Dale said:
You treat it the same as any other uncertainty. You have the formula ##f(F,t)=F \ t## so according to the standard propagation of uncertainty $$\sigma^2_f=\left( \frac{\partial f}{\partial F} \right)^2 \sigma^2_F + \left( \frac{\partial f}{\partial t} \right)^2 \sigma^2_t + 2 \frac{\partial f}{\partial F} \frac{\partial f}{\partial t} \sigma_{Ft}$$

Notice that the units work out naturally.
Sorry, I don't understand your reply. A little over my head. Could you give me a concrete example?
 
e2m2a said:
Sorry, I don't understand your reply. A little over my head. Could you give me a concrete example?
In your case, if the uncertainty in ##F## is un correlated with the uncertainty in ##t## then ##\sigma_{Ft}=0## so the last term drops out. Then $$\frac{\partial f}{\partial F}=t$$ and $$\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}=F$$ and you already know ##F = 3.4##, ##\sigma_F = 0.12##, ##t = 1.7##, and ##\sigma_t= 0.23##. So just plug in and calculate.
 
e2m2a said:
Sorry, I don't understand your reply. A little over my head. Could you give me a concrete example?
You are trying to calculate a quantity called impulse, ##I##, which satisfies ##I=Ft##. The standard error in ##I## is what you are looking for, and is ##\sigma_I## (@Dale called this ##\sigma_f##). This relates to the standard errors in ##F## and ##t##, ##\sigma_F## and ##\sigma_t## respectively, and their covariance, ##\sigma_{Ft}##, through the formula Dale gave.

You gave us ##\sigma_F## and ##\sigma_t##. Do you know how to calculate the partial differentials? If not, it's really easy - ##\frac{\partial I}{\partial F}## is the derivative of ##I## with respect to ##F## when everything else is treated as a constant. Finally, do you think your measurement error in ##F## depends on your measurement error in ##t##? If yes, you need to measure the covariance. If not (which I would think is the case) then ##\sigma_{Ft}=0## and you can ignore the last term.

Plug in the numbers - you'll find that each term has units of ##(\mathrm{Ns})^2##, so the units work out.
 
Thread 'What is the pressure of trapped air inside this tube?'
As you can see from the picture, i have an uneven U-shaped tube, sealed at the short end. I fill the tube with water and i seal it. So the short side is filled with water and the long side ends up containg water and trapped air. Now the tube is sealed on both sides and i turn it in such a way that the traped air moves at the short side. Are my claims about pressure in senarios A & B correct? What is the pressure for all points in senario C? (My question is basically coming from watching...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K