Multiplying Uncertainties in Different Units

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter e2m2a
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Uncertainties Units
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the calculation of uncertainties when multiplying quantities with different units, specifically in the context of impulse calculation. The formula for impulse, represented as I = Ft, is used to derive the standard error in impulse, denoted as σ_I. The standard propagation of uncertainty formula is applied, which includes partial derivatives and covariance terms. A concrete example is provided, illustrating how to compute the uncertainties for 3.4 Newtons ± 0.12 Newtons and 1.7 seconds ± 0.23 seconds, leading to a clear understanding of the relationship between the uncertainties of the individual measurements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, specifically impulse (I = Ft)
  • Familiarity with the standard propagation of uncertainty formula
  • Knowledge of partial derivatives in calculus
  • Ability to interpret and manipulate units in physical calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the standard propagation of uncertainty in more complex scenarios
  • Learn how to calculate partial derivatives for various functions
  • Explore the concept of covariance in measurements
  • Practice calculating uncertainties in different physical contexts, such as energy or momentum
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, engineers working with measurements, and researchers involved in experimental data analysis will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in accurately calculating uncertainties in their work.

e2m2a
Messages
354
Reaction score
13
TL;DR
How do you multiply quantities with their uncertainties when the units are different?
I could not find any clear explanation on multiplying quantities with different units while including their uncertainties. For example, how would you compute the following product with their uncertainties? 3.4 Newtons +/- .12 Newtons x 1.7 seconds +/- .23 seconds
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You treat it the same as any other uncertainty. You have the formula ##f(F,t)=F \ t## so according to the standard propagation of uncertainty $$\sigma^2_f=\left( \frac{\partial f}{\partial F} \right)^2 \sigma^2_F + \left( \frac{\partial f}{\partial t} \right)^2 \sigma^2_t + 2 \frac{\partial f}{\partial F} \frac{\partial f}{\partial t} \sigma_{Ft}$$

Notice that the units work out naturally.
 
Dale said:
You treat it the same as any other uncertainty. You have the formula ##f(F,t)=F \ t## so according to the standard propagation of uncertainty $$\sigma^2_f=\left( \frac{\partial f}{\partial F} \right)^2 \sigma^2_F + \left( \frac{\partial f}{\partial t} \right)^2 \sigma^2_t + 2 \frac{\partial f}{\partial F} \frac{\partial f}{\partial t} \sigma_{Ft}$$

Notice that the units work out naturally.
Sorry, I don't understand your reply. A little over my head. Could you give me a concrete example?
 
e2m2a said:
Sorry, I don't understand your reply. A little over my head. Could you give me a concrete example?
In your case, if the uncertainty in ##F## is un correlated with the uncertainty in ##t## then ##\sigma_{Ft}=0## so the last term drops out. Then $$\frac{\partial f}{\partial F}=t$$ and $$\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}=F$$ and you already know ##F = 3.4##, ##\sigma_F = 0.12##, ##t = 1.7##, and ##\sigma_t= 0.23##. So just plug in and calculate.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibix
e2m2a said:
Sorry, I don't understand your reply. A little over my head. Could you give me a concrete example?
You are trying to calculate a quantity called impulse, ##I##, which satisfies ##I=Ft##. The standard error in ##I## is what you are looking for, and is ##\sigma_I## (@Dale called this ##\sigma_f##). This relates to the standard errors in ##F## and ##t##, ##\sigma_F## and ##\sigma_t## respectively, and their covariance, ##\sigma_{Ft}##, through the formula Dale gave.

You gave us ##\sigma_F## and ##\sigma_t##. Do you know how to calculate the partial differentials? If not, it's really easy - ##\frac{\partial I}{\partial F}## is the derivative of ##I## with respect to ##F## when everything else is treated as a constant. Finally, do you think your measurement error in ##F## depends on your measurement error in ##t##? If yes, you need to measure the covariance. If not (which I would think is the case) then ##\sigma_{Ft}=0## and you can ignore the last term.

Plug in the numbers - you'll find that each term has units of ##(\mathrm{Ns})^2##, so the units work out.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K