Multiplying vectors -- where does cos(theta) go?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gracy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vectors
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the calculation of work done using vectors, specifically how the dot product incorporates the cosine of the angle between the vectors. When vectors are expressed in terms of unit vectors (i, j, k), the cosine factor is implicit in the dot product formula, which simplifies the calculation. The participants clarify that since the unit vectors are orthogonal, the cosine of the angle between different unit vectors is zero, while the cosine for the same direction (like i and -i) is -1. The work done can be calculated using either the coordinate form or the coordinate-free form of the dot product, both yielding consistent results. Understanding this relationship eliminates confusion about the role of cos(theta) in vector multiplication.
gracy
Messages
2,486
Reaction score
83
For example if I have to find out work done.Force and displacement are given to be (2i^+3j^+4k^)and
(-i^-2j^) respectively.
till now i have been thinking that work done=Force multiplied by displacement cos theta but in my book in solution of the problem above work done is calculated by simply multiplying
(2i^+3j^+4k^)and
(-i^-2j^).
where did cos theta go?when vectors are given in terms of i^,j^, k^ we don't write costheta,that's how it works,right?if yes,reason? I know displacement cos theta implies component of displacement along force.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That is not a simple multiplication. Its called dot product. Work is defined as:
$$W=\vec{F}\cdot\vec{s}$$

When force and displacement are given in vector forms, you can also find the angle between them by using$$\cos\theta=\frac{\vec{F}\cdot\vec{s}}{|F|.|s|}$$

You can read it here : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dot_product
 
Titan97 said:
That is not a simple multiplication. Its called dot product. Work is defined as:
W=F⃗ ⋅s⃗​
I know that!but should not magnitude of work done be F S COS theta
 
Its is.
$$W=|F|.|s|.\cos\theta$$
But you have to find cosθ.
This will be the long way to calculate work though.
 
gracy said:
For example if I have to find out work done.Force and displacement are given to be (2i^+3j^+4k^)and
(-i^-2j^) respectively.
till now i have been thinking that work done=Force multiplied by displacement cos theta but in my book in solution of the problem above work done is calculated by simply multiplying
(2i^+3j^+4k^)and
(-i^-2j^).
where did cos theta go?when vectors are given in terms of i^,j^, k^ we don't write costheta,that's how it works,right?if yes,reason? I know displacement cos theta implies component of displacement along force.
Your unit vectors i, j, k are mutually orthogonal to one another (at right angles), so cos(θ) is zero for any i≠j terms. You need to look up the dot product in component form for the question above.
 
Vagn said:
Your unit vectors i, j, k are mutually orthogonal to one another (at right angles), so cos(θ) is zero for any i≠j terms
And what about i ,-i terms?will it be cos 180 i.e -1?
 
gracy said:
And what about i ,-i terms?will it be cos 180 i.e -1?
Yes,that's correct.
 
gracy said:
And what about i ,-i terms?will it be cos 180 i.e -1?
The -i component can be understood as (value -1, direction i). With that understanding, when you multiply 2i^ by -i^ the relevant angle is the angle between i^ and i^. That is zero degrees. The result is 2 * -1 * cos(0).

Understood that way, 180 degrees never enters in. All the cosines are equal to 1.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy and Titan97
Assuming that both force and displacement are vector constants (i.e., the force doesn't vary and acts along a straight line path), the work done is given by this dot product:
$$W = \vec{F} \cdot \vec{S}$$
Let's assume that ##\vec{F} = <f_1, f_2, f_3>## and ##\vec{S} = < s_1, s_2, s_3>##. Personally, I like this notation better than ##f_1 \vec{i} + f_2 \vec{j} + f_3 \vec{k}## as it is easier to write.

There are two ways to calculate the dot product shown above.
Coordinate form
##W = f_1 s_1 + f_2 s_2 + f_3 s_3##

Coordinate-free form
##W = |\vec{F}| |\vec{S}| cos(\theta)##, where ##\theta## is the angle between the two vectors, and |F| and |S| are the magnitudes of the two vectors. For vectors in R3, the magnitude is the square root of the sum of the squares of the three components. For example, ##|\vec{F} = \sqrt{f_1^2 + f_2^2 + f_3^2}##.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #10
jbriggs444 said:
The -i component can be understood as (value -1, direction i).
Just as valid would be the interpretation that -i has a value of 1 in the direction of -i (i.e., to the left).
jbriggs444 said:
With that understanding, when you multiply 2i^ by -i^ the relevant angle is the angle between i^ and i^. That is zero degrees. The result is 2 * -1 * cos(0).

Understood that way, 180 degrees never enters in. All the cosines are equal to 1.

Using my interpretation, we get the same answer via a different route.
$$\vec{2i} \cdot -\vec{i} = |2\vec{i}| |-\vec{i}| \cos(180°) = (2)(1)(-1) = -2$$
 
  • Like
Likes gracy and jbriggs444

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
715
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K