Sign convention on work done to a closed system containing gas

  • #1
zenterix
480
70
TL;DR Summary
I am following the book "Physical Chemistry" by Silbey, Alberty, and Bawendy.



I am having a difficult time with sign conventions used when calculating work done on a closed system containing a gas.
Here is the reasoning as it appears in the book.

Consider the following setup

1694244174302.png


Work (w) is a scalar quantity defined ##w=\vec{f}\cdot\vec{L}##.

where ##\vec{f}## is the vector force and ##\vec{L}## is the vector length of path.

If the force vector of magnitude ##\lVert \vec{f}\rVert## and the vector length of magnitude ##\lVert \vec{L} \rVert## are separated by an angle ##\theta##, the work is given by ##\lVert\vec{f}\rVert\lVert\vec{L}\rVert\cos{\theta}##.

Pressure, ##P## is force per unit area, ie ##P=\frac{\lVert \vec{f}\rVert} {\lVert\vec{A}\rVert}##.

Consider a situation where the gas in the cylinder above is expanding, pushing the piston upward.

The differential quantity of work done by the expanding gas to move the piston a distance ##dL## is, according to the book

$$w=\lVert P\vec{A}\rVert dL=PdV\tag{1}$$

My first question is the following: in the context of (1), it seems that there is an implicit cosine term; that is, (1) is obtained from a dot product, and hence it seems that ##\lVert P\vec{A}\rVert## and ##dL## must all be positive, and that implicitly we have a ##\cos{0}=1## term. Is this correct?

If it is correct, then ##dV## can also only be positive in (1).

On the other hand, we could write out

$$w=\lVert P\vec{A}\rVert dL\cos{\theta}=PdV\tag{2}$$

where ##dV## is now ##\lVert \vec{A}\rVert dL\cos{\theta}##, in which case ##dV## can be negative.

The book then says

Work ##w## can be positive or negative since work may be done on a system or a system may do work on its surroundings. The convention on ##w## is that it is positive when work is done on the system of interest and negative when the system does work on the surroundings. Thus, the differential of the ##PV## work don on a system is given by $$dw=-P_{ext}dV$$ where ##P_{ext}## is the external or applied pressure.

This is a bit confusing to me. As far as I know, work is done by a force. Whether the gas expands and pushes the piston up, or the gas is compressed as the piston moves down, we have a pair of Newton's third law forces shared between the piston and the mass, and between the piston and the gas.

Each force does some amount of work.

The book has this depiction

1694250465825.png

As far as I can tell,

in (a), the force applied by the piston on the gas (which is the same as the force applied by the mass onto the piston, since the latter has zero mass and there is no friction with the cylinder) is in the same direction as the displacement vector of the gas. This is the same work done by the force of the mass on the piston and is positive.

in (b), the force applied by the piston on the gas is in the opposite direction to the displacement of the gas, and so the work done by this force is negative.

Now, the convention says that in (a) work is "done on the system" and in (b) work is "done on the surroundings", and also that $$dw=-P_{ext}dV$$.

##P_{ext}## is said to be the external pressure, that is, the pressure of the piston on the gas.

Putting everything together, it seems that in (a) what is happening is that the force created by the mass on top of the piston is doing positive work and in (b) it is doing negative work. These results come out from the expression

$$\lVert P\vec{A}\rVert dL \cos{\theta}$$

However, the book uses another expression

$$-P_{ext}dV$$

Now, ##P## is the same as ##P_{ext}##. It is not clear to me how to reconcile these two expressions as it concerns the ##dV## term. It would seem that it is as simple as

$$dV=-\lVert \vec{A} \rVert dL\cos{\theta}$$

In my opinion, all the confusion arising from all of this is because the book in question isn't great.
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
  • #2
Here is another simple example I don't quite understand

Suppose we have the situation depicted in the picture of the original post.

We pull the stops out and the piston falls to an equilibrium position at a volume ##V_2## and a pressure ##P_2##.

Says the book,

The pressure of the gas at the end of the process is given by ##P_2=\frac{mg}{A}## where ##g## is the acceleration due to gravity, and ##A## is the area of the piston. The amount of work lost in the surroundings is ##mgh##, where ##h## is the difference in height, and so the work done on the gas is

$$w=mgh=-P_2(V_2-V_1)$$

Since ##V_2<V_1## the work done on the gas is positive.

I understand why the work is ##mgh##: the weight of the mass is ##mg## and this is the force being applied over the area ##A## that is the piston and this is transmitted to the gas in the cylinder.

This is positive because the weight of the mass is pointed down and the displacement is also pointed down. The dot product is positive.

What I don't get is the expression ##-P_{ext}dV=-P_2(V_2-V_1)##.

As I explain in the original post, we start with a dot product ##P\lVert \vec{A}\rVert \lVert dL\rVert\cos{\theta}##. Now ##\lVert \vec{A}\rVert \lVert dL\rVert## is a volume, and the cosine gives us the positive/negative sign (since we are considering our force being perpendicular to the area to which it is applied). What are we calling ##dV## and how do we think about the sign convention (ie, the negative sign that is introduced)?
 
  • #3
Are. you saying that W is the work done by the gas on the piston, or is W the work done by the piston on the gas? One is the negative of the other.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #4
Chestermiller said:
Are. you saying that W is the work done by the gas on the piston, or is W the work done by the piston on the gas? One is the negative of the other.
I agree one is the negative of the other. The thing is, I don't have any conceptual misunderstanding. I think I'm just trying to sort out what ##w## means for this book. When people talk about work in the context of the closed system I showed in the original question, how do people usually define ##w##?

Conversely, given the expression chosen by the book, namely that work is ##-P_{ext}\Delta V##, what force does this work?
 
  • #5
zenterix said:
, how do people usually define w?
Both ways. Chemists versus engineers/physicists; so long it is clearly stated which convention is used/understood, there's little point to arguing/debating which is correct.
 
  • #6
zenterix said:
I agree one is the negative of the other. The thing is, I don't have any conceptual misunderstanding. I think I'm just trying to sort out what ##w## means for this book. When people talk about work in the context of the closed system I showed in the original question, how do people usually define ##w##?

Conversely, given the expression chosen by the book, namely that work is ##-P_{ext}\Delta V##, what force does this work?
This is the work done by the surroundings (the piston) on the system (the gas in the cylinder). Force balance on piston: $$F_g\hat{z}+P_{ext}A(-\hat{z})=0$$ where ##\hat{z}## is the unit vector in the upward z direction. Piston displacement = ##\hat{z}dz##. So the work done by the piston on the gas is $$dW=(P_{ext}A(-\hat{z})\centerdot \hat{z}dz=-P_{ext}Adz=-P_{ext}dV=-F_gdz$$If dV is positive, it means the gas expands (and the piston moves up), and if dV is negative, it means that the gas is compressed (and the piston moves down).
 

1. What is the sign convention on work done to a closed system containing gas?

The sign convention on work done to a closed system containing gas is based on the direction of the work done. If the gas expands (volume increases), work is considered positive. If the gas compresses (volume decreases), work is considered negative.

2. Why is the sign convention for work done on a closed system containing gas important?

The sign convention for work done on a closed system containing gas is important because it helps us determine the direction of energy transfer. It also allows us to calculate the total work done on the system by considering the signs of individual work done.

3. How does the sign convention for work done on a closed system containing gas differ from other systems?

The sign convention for work done on a closed system containing gas differs from other systems because gases have the ability to expand and compress, while other systems may not. This means that the direction of work done on a gas may not always be the same as the direction of energy transfer.

4. Can the sign convention for work done on a closed system containing gas be applied to all types of gases?

Yes, the sign convention for work done on a closed system containing gas can be applied to all types of gases. This convention is based on the direction of work done, which is independent of the type of gas present in the system.

5. How does the sign convention for work done on a closed system containing gas relate to the first law of thermodynamics?

The sign convention for work done on a closed system containing gas is closely related to the first law of thermodynamics, which states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transferred. By following the sign convention, we can accurately track the direction and amount of energy transfer in a closed system containing gas.

Similar threads

Replies
45
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
830
  • Thermodynamics
Replies
8
Views
555
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
900
  • General Math
Replies
1
Views
703
  • Thermodynamics
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • Thermodynamics
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
564
Back
Top