Analysis Multivariable analysis textbooks

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding suitable textbooks for studying multivariable calculus. A participant expresses interest in starting the subject early and seeks alternatives to W. Rudin's "Principles of Mathematical Analysis," which is noted for its difficulty. Recommendations include "Vector Calculus, Linear Algebra, and Differential Forms" by Hubbard and Hubbard, which is praised for its clarity. Stewart's Calculus is mentioned as a standard applied textbook for multivariable calculus courses, providing useful computational exercises. "The Elements of Real Analysis" by Bartle is also referenced, but it is considered more challenging and less suitable for a calculus course. The participant confirms they can work on problems from Abbott's book, indicating a willingness to explore these resources.
Santiago24
Messages
32
Reaction score
6
Hi! the next semester i'll take a course on multivariable calculus but i'd like to study it now. I've "Principles of mathematical analysis" by W.Rudin but i heard that the sections about this are hard to read. If there is a textbook like "Understading analysis" by Stephen Abbott but in multivariable version i really i'd like to read it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you able to do problems from Abbot?

There is a nice book by Hubbard and Hubbard called Vector Calculus, Linear Algebra, and Differential Forms.

My class on Multivariable Calculus was based on Stewart Calculus. It is an applied book, but served its purpose. That is usually the standard for a multivariable calculus course in the calculus sequence.

Theres also The Elements of Real Analysis by Bartle. I read it due to not really understanding anything past a certain point in Spivak: Calculus on Manifolds.

Bartle is more of an Analysis book. It is bit more harder to read then Abbot. Ie., it has examples you actually have to read /re-reread / and work out. I am hesitant to recommend this for a calculus course.

I think Hubbard Hubbard would be the better option... Maybe look at Stewart for more computational exercises or the book assigned by your University.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Santiago24
MidgetDwarf said:
Are you able to do problems from Abbot?

There is a nice book by Hubbard and Hubbard called Vector Calculus, Linear Algebra, and Differential Forms.

My class on Multivariable Calculus was based on Stewart Calculus. It is an applied book, but served its purpose. That is usually the standard for a multivariable calculus course in the calculus sequence.

Theres also The Elements of Real Analysis by Bartle. I read it due to not really understanding anything past a certain point in Spivak: Calculus on Manifolds.

Bartle is more of an Analysis book. It is bit more harder to read then Abbot. Ie., it has examples you actually have to read /re-reread / and work out. I am hesitant to recommend this for a calculus course.

I think Hubbard Hubbard would be the better option... Maybe look at Stewart for more computational exercises or the book assigned by your University.
Yes i can do the problems from Abbot book. I'll check this books, thanks!
 
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Back
Top