Munkre's Topology Ch 1 sec. 2, ex. #1:

  • Context: Constructive Proofs 
  • Thread starter Thread starter benorin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    topology
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Munkres' Topology, specifically Chapter 1, Section 2, Exercise #1, which involves proving properties of functions and their images. The exercise requires demonstrating that for a function \( f: A \rightarrow B \), if \( A_0 \subset A \) and \( B_0 \subset B \), then \( A_0 \subset f^{-1}(f(A_0)) \) holds true, with equality if \( f \) is injective. Additionally, it asserts that \( f(f^{-1}(B_0)) \subset B_0 \) holds, with equality if \( f \) is surjective. The discussion highlights the challenges faced by individuals revisiting topology after a long hiatus, emphasizing the importance of understanding definitions and the flow of proofs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic set theory and functions
  • Familiarity with the concepts of injective and surjective functions
  • Knowledge of preimages and images in the context of functions
  • Experience with formal proof writing in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definitions and properties of injective and surjective functions in detail
  • Learn about the concepts of images and preimages in set theory
  • Practice writing formal proofs, particularly in topology and analysis
  • Explore additional exercises in Munkres' Topology to reinforce understanding
USEFUL FOR

Students of topology, mathematics educators, and anyone seeking to strengthen their understanding of function properties and formal proof techniques in mathematical analysis.

benorin
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,442
Reaction score
191
Summary:: Subset of Codomain is Superset of Image of Preimage, and similar proof for subset of domain

I was having a hard time doing the intro chapter's exercises in Munkres' Topology text when last I worked on it, and I just wanted to make sure that there's nothing betwixt analysis and topology I'm missing? It's been a while since college for me, so perhaps I'm just a bit forgetful of things disused for two decades. The exercise I got stuck on was

Munkres' Topology Ch 1 sec. 2, ex. #1:

If ##f: A\rightarrow B## and ##A_0\subset A## and ##B_0\subset B##. (a) show that ##A_0\subset f^{-1}(f(A_0))## and that equality holds if ##f## is injective. (b) show that ##f(f^{-1}(B_0))\subset B_0## and that equality holds if ##f## is surjective.

I even found a proof (proofwiki.org) that is essentially the same problem. Couldn't follow the flow of the proof much at all; there didn't seem to be a rhyme nor reason to the starting and ending points of the proof, why one seemly identical definition differing only in notation to the next line was considered and step worth writing out. I'm typically able to follow even protracted ##\epsilon , \delta -##proofs like in real analysis but this simple, basic algebra type proof is giving me trouble I did not expect. Munkres did mention that students would feel comfortable in the beginning of the chapter and find their expertise evaporating near the middle of it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let us start with proving ##A_0\subseteq f^{-1}(f(A_0))##.

You prove these things by showing that ##x\in A_0\implies x\in f^{-1}(f(A_0))##.

So, let us fix ##x\in A_0##. You have to show that ##x\in f^{-1}(f(A_0))##. By definition, this means that ##f(x)\in f(A_0)##. But since ##x\in A_0##, trivially ##f(x)\in f(A_0)## so this is really writing out what the definitions mean.

More direct, if ##x\in A_0##, then ##f(x)\in f(A_0)##, hence ##x\in f^{-1}(f(A_0))##.

Another way to think about this, which I use, is just try to understand in words what is happening: ##f^{-1}(f(A_0))## is the set of all points in the domain that get mapped by ##f## to ##f(A_0)##. Clearly ##A_0## is contained in this set.

Were you able to understand this? If yes, can you try to prove ##f(f^{-1}(B_0))\subseteq B_0## on your own now?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
52K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K