Relativity "Must-read" papers in general relativity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a list of essential papers in general relativity compiled by Emanuele Berti, prompting participants to suggest additional influential works. Notable mentions include Fulling's 1973 paper on quantum field theory in curved spacetime, which highlights the differences in vacuum perception between inertial and accelerated observers. W.G. Unruh's paper on experimental black-hole evaporation is also recognized for its practical insights into complex concepts like Hawking radiation. Participants express that the list lacks significant contributions from key figures such as Roger Penrose and R. Geroch, suggesting their works should be included. The conversation touches on the importance of understanding singularities and the topological aspects of general relativity, with references to Penrose's "Techniques in Differential Topology in Relativity" and related lecture notes. Overall, the dialogue emphasizes the need for a broader selection of classic papers that every relativist should engage with.
ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,097
Reaction score
1,384
I found an interesting list of "must-read" papers in the field of general relativity compiled by Emanuele Berti:
https://pages.jh.edu/eberti2/posts/must-read-paper-list/

Are there any notable exceptions, or other "classic" papers that - in your view - every relativist ought to have read?
 
  • Like
Likes yucheng and vanhees71
Physics news on Phys.org
Fulling's 1973 Phys. Rev. D paper:
https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.7.2850
It preceded and anticipated the Hawking/Unruh radiation papers. Namely, it showed, in language that even I can understand, that the QFT vacuum is not preserved under arbitrary coordinate transformations, even in flat spacetime. In other words, an inertial observer and an accelerated observer in flat spacetime will not agree on the vacuum.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier, dextercioby, vanhees71 and 1 other person
ergospherical said:
I found an interesting list of "must-read" papers in the field of general relativity compiled by Emanuele Berti:
https://pages.jh.edu/eberti2/posts/must-read-paper-list/
I would bet that Berti is the only guy on the planet who read them all.
 
  • Haha
Likes romsofia, vanhees71 and ergospherical
W.G. Unruh, Experimental black-hole evaporation?
https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.46.1351

This paper demystified GR by showing that counterintuitive notions of curved spacetime, black hole and Hawking radiation are in fact very much analogous to something much more mundane, that can even be prepared in the laboratory.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and ergospherical
Interesting, he has put one of his papers on that list too.

The list doesn't have any papers by Penrose, nor Geroch. I would say that quite a few of their papers should be on a list like that. Also more Hawking papers.
 
  • Like
Likes robphy, Demystifier and ergospherical
martinbn said:
Interesting, he has put one of his papers on that list too.

The list doesn't have any papers by Penrose, nor Geroch. I would say that quite a few of their papers should be on a list like that. Also more Hawking papers.
Yeah, the list says more about him than about what everybody must read.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and romsofia
ergospherical said:
I found an interesting list of "must-read" papers in the field of general relativity compiled by Emanuele Berti:
https://pages.jh.edu/eberti2/posts/must-read-paper-list/
font-emphasis mine...

Must-read paper list...
a selection of classic/well written/interesting papers
for our weekly group meetings this coming Spring.

ergospherical said:
Are there any notable exceptions, or other "classic" papers that - in your view - every relativist ought to have read?

Techniques in Differential Topology in Relativity
Roger Penrose
https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611970609
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, ergospherical and Demystifier
  • #10
robphy said:
Techniques in Differential Topology in Relativity
Roger Penrose
https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611970609
This is nice, the topological aspects of GR is a subject I haven't touched much/at all because I haven't taken a maths course on topology yet, but this looks very readable
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #11
Demystifier said:
Would you call it a book or a review paper?
Lecture notes.

These notes by Lerner of Penrose’s conference lectures helped form Penrose’s “Techniques…”
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/3-540-05793-5_1
(Part of
Methods of Local and Global Differential Geometry in General Relativity
Proceedings of the Regional Conference on Relativity held at the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, July 13–17, 1970.)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Demystifier and vanhees71

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
6K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Back
Top