- #1
entropy1
- 1,230
- 71
Would this be correct: in MWI, if a binary measurement is made, the world splits, say in world A and B. Is it then correct to say that you experience both A and B, but that the experiences of A and B become separated?
entropy1 said:Is it then correct to say that you experience both A and B, but that the experiences of A and B become separated?
If there is a "me" in the ordinary sense, and there is, there must be a "me" in any world, right? Perhaps just not "the same" ones. So indeed the question arises if it is still "me" when brached off; is that what you mean?PeterDonis said:There is no good way to describe what the MWI says happens to your experience using ordinary language. The problem is that words like "you" and "experience" can't possibly mean in the MWI what they mean in ordinary conversation. In the case you describe, there will be a "you" that experiences A and a "you" that experiences B, and both of these "yous" will be "descended", physically, from "you" before the measurement. But are they "the same" you, having both experiences? There is no good answer, because the underlying assumptions behind our ordinary concept of "the same" are not valid for this case.
entropy1 said:I wonder if I am still abiding by the forum rules with this post .
entropy1 said:the question arises if it is still "me" when brached off; is that what you mean?
entropy1 said:The alternative is that "me" is an illusion altogether, perhaps generated by the brain.
I like to think of it as being analog to biological twins. The other copy is not you.entropy1 said:Would this be correct: in MWI, if a binary measurement is made, the world splits, say in world A and B. Is it then correct to say that you experience both A and B, but that the experiences of A and B become separated?
The problem I see with that is, to be consistent, the copy you are now is not you too.Demystifier said:I like to think of it as being analog to biological twins. The other copy is not you.
Why not?entropy1 said:The problem I see with that is, to be consistent, the copy you are now is not you too.
Because the math handles all copies equivalently, I suspect.Demystifier said:Why not?
So? How that differs from biological twins?entropy1 said:Because the math handles all copies equivalently, I suspect.
Good point.Demystifier said:So? How that differs from biological twins?
entropy1 said:to be consistent, the copy you are now is not you too
The MWI (Many-Worlds Interpretation) experience of created worlds is a theory in quantum mechanics that suggests the existence of multiple parallel universes. According to this theory, every time a quantum measurement is made, the universe splits into multiple branches, each representing a different outcome. This means that there are countless versions of our reality, each with slight variations.
The MWI experience of created worlds differs from other interpretations, such as the Copenhagen interpretation, in that it does not involve the collapse of the wave function. In the MWI, all possible outcomes of a quantum measurement exist simultaneously in different parallel universes, while in the Copenhagen interpretation, only one outcome is considered to be real.
Currently, there is no direct evidence for the existence of parallel universes or the MWI experience of created worlds. However, the theory is mathematically consistent and has been supported by some experiments, such as the delayed-choice quantum eraser experiment. Further research and experimentation are needed to provide stronger evidence for the MWI.
If the MWI experience of created worlds is true, it would mean that every possible outcome of a quantum measurement exists in a parallel universe. This has profound implications for the concept of free will and the nature of reality. It also has potential applications in quantum computing and communication.
It is currently impossible to prove or disprove the existence of parallel universes and the MWI experience of created worlds. However, as technology and scientific understanding continue to advance, it may be possible to gather more evidence and potentially test the theory in the future. Until then, the MWI remains a fascinating and controversial topic in the field of quantum mechanics.