My first Space X Launch Experience

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the quiet performance of SpaceX launches, particularly from Cape Canaveral. A participant highlights insights from an experienced jet and rocket engineer, emphasizing that the quietness is due to the innovative arrangement of nine engines, which allows for better management of the boundary layer and smoother exhaust mixing. This design enables SpaceX to operate with significant engine redundancy, maintaining the ability to reach orbit even with multiple engines shut down, contrasting with NASA's traditional focus on high reliability and cost. The conversation also references a June 2008 Popular Science article for further reading on the topic.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rocket propulsion systems
  • Familiarity with aerodynamic principles
  • Knowledge of engine design and noise reduction techniques
  • Awareness of SpaceX's engineering innovations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "SpaceX engine design and redundancy" for insights on their engineering approach
  • Explore "aerodynamic noise reduction techniques in aerospace" to understand noise management
  • Read the June 2008 Popular Science article on rocket quietness for historical context
  • Investigate "high bypass ratio jet engines" to learn about their impact on noise reduction
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, rocket enthusiasts, and anyone interested in the advancements of SpaceX's launch technology and noise reduction strategies.

Pkruse
Messages
465
Reaction score
2
I saw my first Space X launch from near Cape Canaveral. I've been watching launches since 1966, and this was by far the quietest of this size vehicle that I've ever heard.

How do you suppose they made it so quiet?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I did a Google search on your thread title, and got a few hits. Apparently there was a Popular Science article in June 2008 about the subject -- the link recommends going to your local public library to read the article.

BTW, I also got a hit on "Silent Rocket" -- do not click into that link... :blushing:
 
Hmm, I found the issue highlights online, and the quiet rocket inventor article is not listed...

http://www.popsci.com/category/tags/june-2008

.
 
I had an opportunity to talk with an old jet and rocket engineer, who is still working and is very sharp. His specialty is the aerodynamic analyis. He pointed out that I already knew that in a jet engine, the high noise comes from the rapid and forceful mixing of the exhaust with ambient air along a shear boundary, and that the reason modern airplanes are so quiet is because we have learned to mix the exhaust gasses with ambient in a much smoother and gentler manner. That is why modern engines are so fat with a huge fan up front and a high bypass ratio. He pointed out that Space X did the same thing in another way by putting nine engines on the back, and that is why it is so quiet. I should have thought of that, but didn't.
 
So the nine engines are arranged to manage the boundary layer better? Interesting...
 
I'll first state what I know, and then tell you my best guess as to how this works.

They advertise that they can still make orbit with 2 or 3 engines shut down. They are also carrying less than 10% of full capacity. So they clearly have lots of reserve engine capacity.

Guessing: With all engines running, they could throttle down the outboard engines for smoother mixing with ambient. That would leave one in the center to run at 100%.

NASA never designed with so much safety margin. So their stuff had to be much more reliable, which costs massively in schedule and cost in all phases of program life. Space X saved a ton of money and will continue to save for the life of the program by carrying redundancy and not paying for high reliability for individual components and systems.
 
Due to the constant never ending supply of "cool stuff" happening in Aerospace these days I'm creating this thread to consolidate posts every time something new comes along. Please feel free to add random information if its relevant. So to start things off here is the SpaceX Dragon launch coming up shortly, I'll be following up afterwards to see how it all goes. :smile: https://blogs.nasa.gov/spacex/

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 271 ·
10
Replies
271
Views
28K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K