What's the Story Behind My Vintage Computer Collection?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dlgoff
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Computer
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around nostalgia for vintage computing devices, with users sharing memories and experiences related to old computers and calculators. Notable mentions include the Casio and Commodore Vic-20, highlighting their significance in early computing history. Users reminisce about programming in BASIC, creating games, and the evolution of technology from slide rules to personal computers. There are references to specific models like the TI SR-50 and HP-41CX, showcasing their long-lasting impact and continued use. The conversation also touches on the transition from mechanical devices to electronic computing, with a sense of loss for older technologies that have been replaced or forgotten. Overall, the thread captures a sense of community among enthusiasts reflecting on their shared past in computing.
dlgoff
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,441
Reaction score
3,275
Side 1

http://imageshack.us/a/img849/9595/bvqc.jpg

Side 2

http://imageshack.us/a/img203/7779/we6s.jpg

They still work. :approve:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Computer science news on Phys.org
Wow, I love it :!)! Especially the chicken scratch on the "APCO Air Valve Computer"!

You should have turned the Casio over for the second photo :biggrin:.
 
Here's some close-ups.

http://imageshack.us/a/img703/1097/a0i3.jpg
http://imageshack.us/a/img440/8231/d518.jpg

http://imageshack.us/a/img822/6487/de6d.jpg
http://imageshack.us/a/img850/2756/yq8t.jpg

http://imageshack.us/a/img844/4444/a3io.jpg
http://imageshack.us/a/img202/6083/bcde.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I threw away all of my old computers and handhelds, well, most were destroyed in a flood. I had a Cassiopeia, way back when. In my last move my old Sun Microsystems computers got "lost".
 
lisab said:
You should have turned the Casio over for the second photo :biggrin:.
You're right. Here it is.

http://imageshack.us/a/img96/9119/21oy.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Evo said:
I threw away all of my old computers and handhelds, well, most were destroyed in a flood. I had a Cassiopeia, way back when. In my last move my old Sun Microsystems computers got "lost".
I'd love to have an old Sun. When I dug out my 6 digit computer (Casio), that had been in a box of junk for probably >35 years, still had 2 AA batteries in it and when I switched it on, several of the blue number segment lit up.
 
I still have one of those 100% metal computers. I lost my 100% bamboo one some time ago. The bamboo one was of course better.

I also have some parts from Symbolics machine #2. Non-functional, but still rather symbolic of the AI phase of my career.
 
dlgoff said:
You're right. Here it is.

:thumbs:
 
I have my old sliderules still, both bamboo, both LogLog DeciTrig with one 12" a long rule and the other a pocket rule. I also have an addiator and a Concise circular sliderule with a tiny scientific cheatsheet pullout with a bunch of facts, conversion factors and a complete periodic table.

For electronic stuff, an early HP handheld and a TI SR-50 that works really slow by todays standard.

As a teen I had a Digicomp, a mechanical 3 bit computer, but I think my Mom sold it in one of her legendary garage sales. Now on ebay they can be had for $200 or more depending on the quality.
 
  • #10
dlgoff said:
http://imageshack.us/a/img703/1097/a0i3.jpg

That's how the real thing looks like :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
D H said:
I still have one of those 100% metal computers. I lost my 100% bamboo one some time ago. The bamboo one was of course better.
:cry:
 
  • #12
jedishrfu said:
I have my old sliderules still, ...
Me too.

<< Giant image deleted by Mentor -- Try again Don! >>
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #13
Borek said:
That's how the real thing looks like :smile:
It belonged to my father who DID the real thing. :approve:
 
  • #14
dlgoff, I can't see the images. How old is your computer collection? Are you planning to sell it?
 
  • #15
jmneutr0nn3 said:
dlgoff, I can't see the images. How old is your computer collection? Are you planning to sell it?

Maybe they're theoretical. No images seem to have survived in this thread.
 
  • #16
dlgof is here almost daily, maybe we can get him to fix the images :)
 
  • #17
jedishrfu said:
As a teen I had a Digicomp, a mechanical 3 bit computer

Wow, that brings back memories! I had one of those too, but I think I was a bit younger, maybe junior high school (middle school). I remember being intrigued by it, but I don't think I actually learned anything about bit-level computer logic from it. I think that didn't happen until I actually had to teach some of that material (the different kinds of gates, etc.), after more than ten years of experience in Fortran programming.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digi-Comp_I
 
Last edited:
  • #18
The images were uploaded to ImageShack.us as a free service but now they want a monthly membership fee and have hide them unless I pay. I'll try to upload them to my new image hosting site. I'll have to find them first.

@ jmneutr0nn3. These computers probably aren't the kinds you're thinking of though. :)
 
  • #19
SteamKing said:
Maybe they're theoretical. No images seem to have survived in this thread.

So that explains other images that are missing from other threads. I think I saw a lot of them on flower and animal lovers threads. They don't appear no matter how many times I refresh the page.
 
  • #20
Here they are:

iqVHTdg.jpg


xHsl980.jpg


fxWZaeJ.jpg


laGKcTm.jpg


1rrTO1S.jpg


os3JbGg.jpg


rGOUBUR.jpg


rVEBFiD.jpg


T78jvKL.jpg
 
  • #21
I was going through some of my old boxes and found my first computer. It came with a http://www.beatriceco.com/bti/porticus/bell/belllabs_kits_ss.html that Bell Labs was handing out to those interested. They had set up a booth at our little towns annual carnival. Thanks Bell Labs.


sF9WVbF.jpg



Flip side


Qt0jIyh.jpg
 
  • #22
dlgoff said:
I was going through some of my old boxes and found my first computer.

My first computer was a Commodore Vic-20. My mom bought it for me in 1982, I think, when I was 14. I remember thinking, what the hell am I going to do with this? I don't think "hello world" was around then, but I followed the manual and ran a goto loop and printed something on my TV through the RF receiver, and, of course, I was hooked instantly. I bought a book entitled, "Programming the 6502," which came with a handy schematic of the processor, and learned that computer from the inside out.

I even breadboarded a memory expansion to it. It only came with a few kilobytes, and to get a few more you had to buy this cartridge that plugged into the back for something like 30-40 bucks. It was a long time ago, but I think I just bought a few static ram chips at radio shack and got the same amount of ram for about 5 or 6 bucks. Me and a buddy of mine were going to go into the memory business after discovering this but got sidetracked with adolescent issues.

I don't still have the Vic-20, but I have the original breadboard memory expansion prototype and a few photoetched circuit boards in storage somewhere. Lol.
 
  • #23
dlgoff said:
Here they are:...

laGKcTm.jpg

...

Was there there some kind of Einsteinian "Power-Energy equivalence theorem" back then that you old guys have since covered up?

pf.2014.07.21.1641.what.year.did.they.change.energy.to.power.jpg

:devil: :-p
 
  • #24
OmCheeto said:
Was there there some kind of Einsteinian "Power-Energy equivalence theorem" back then that you old guys have since covered up?

pf.2014.07.21.1641.what.year.did.they.change.energy.to.power.jpg

:devil: :-p
You don't want to know. o:)
 
  • #25
DiracPool said:
My first computer was a Commodore Vic-20. My mom bought it for me in 1982, I think, when I was 14. I remember thinking, what the hell am I going to do with this? I don't think "hello world" was around then, but I followed the manual and ran a goto loop and printed something on my TV through the RF receiver, and, of course, I was hooked instantly. I bought a book entitled, "Programming the 6502," which came with a handy schematic of the processor, and learned that computer from the inside out.

I even breadboarded a memory expansion to it. It only came with a few kilobytes, and to get a few more you had to buy this cartridge that plugged into the back for something like 30-40 bucks. It was a long time ago, but I think I just bought a few static ram chips at radio shack and got the same amount of ram for about 5 or 6 bucks. Me and a buddy of mine were going to go into the memory business after discovering this but got sidetracked with adolescent issues.

I don't still have the Vic-20, but I have the original breadboard memory expansion prototype and a few photoetched circuit boards in storage somewhere. Lol.
Awesome. Love it. I'm guessing the language was BASIC? Do you still have the book?

51cprEn9meL.jpg


image compliments of https://www.amazon.com/dp/0895880466/?tag=pfamazon01-20
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #26
dlgoff said:
Awesome. Love it. I'm guessing the language was BASIC? Do you still have the book?

51cprEn9meL.jpg


image compliments of https://www.amazon.com/dp/0895880466/?tag=pfamazon01-20


Lol. That rules the world. Idk, I'd have to look around. Actually, I think I might. The Vic-20 came with basic pre-installed. I don't know if installed is the right word, there really wasn't enough ram to install anything. I remember having all my programs "installed" on cassette tapes. I can't remember if I had to manually load BASIC or not, I don't think so.

Here's a good story, though. I don't know if you remember, but there used to be this magazine called COMPUTE! Yes, with the exclamation point included. In 1982, from what I remember a good number of the articles were hobbyists publishing programs for the Vic-20 and perhaps some other similar builds. This was before the IBM hit big. I actually wrote a video game called "Blitzoid" that I submitted to Compute! that they accepted for publication and paid me, get this, $175 for. Not bad for a 14 year old. I thought I was going to be the next whiz kid (which didn't happen:frown:)

In any case, this game had an, admittedly, crude resemblance to "Defender," and, although I'd like to accuse them of ripping me off, it looks as though Defender came out in 1980. So maybe I'm the culprit. The interesting part, though, is that I initially wrote the whole program in Basic, but it was too slow. I found that there was one subroutine that was the issue, one that was repeated many times to move the "ship" up and down the screen. My remedy was to write the subroutine in machine/assembly language. But guess what, I had to buy another one of those 30 dollar cartridges to do it. Lol. That was a proprietary ROM chip, I believe, so I just couldn't go to radio shack and buy it.

Whatever, the case, I was blown away at the difference it made, that subroutine actually made it a fun, playable game. I remember spending a lot of time on it trying to tighten up the code, and did some creative things, which is why I think Compute! bought the code.

By the way, I don't think they ever actually published the article. I contacted them several years later and they said at that time they were just buying up a lot of the submissions for use in a special video game issue that never went to press. Oh well, I still got the $175, so that's cool with me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #27
The "Basic Interpreter" firmware was on ROM chips, separate from the user RAM

Gosh, that takes me back many years. During the '80's and early '90's I serviced the Commodore and Atari ranges of computers
Commodore Vic-20, C64, Amiga etc and the Atari 400, 800, 520 and 1040 etc

Them were the days haha

cheers
Dave
 
  • #28
davenn said:
The "Basic Interpreter" firmware was on ROM chips, separate from the user RAM

Gosh, that takes me back many years. During the '80's and early '90's I serviced the Commodore and Atari ranges of computers
Commodore Vic-20, C64, Amiga etc and the Atari 400, 800, 520 and 1040 etc

Them were the days haha

cheers
Dave

Lol, davenn. Thanks for that, That makes sense now. ROM chip on the motherboard. Those were the days. I remember back then that we all thought that the utility of computers was going to be to turn your lights on and off during the day/night cycle and program your water sprinkler, etc. That may seem absurd now, but we really didn't know where this thing was going to go.

Back then, I remember having one of those phone things, that you stuck your phone on. There was no internet, but you could dial into these billboard things, I think probably the precursors of usenet, which I never really got into. I take back my earlier statement, I think we all knew where this was eventually going to go, an internet based kind of thing, I just think we all thought it was going to happen a lot sooner. In 1982, I thought the internet was going to be around in 1985. Although, I didn't think it was going to be popular media driven, which is what eventually happened, I thought it was going to be driven by computer enthusiasts like myself.

So, personally, what I thought was going to happen in 1985 didn't actually happen until basically 2010. Now it's happening. I think for the old timers like me, it's coming as a bit of a shock. Not because we didn't expect it, but because we expected it a long time ago and just thought that maybe it just wasn't ever going to happen. But now it is..
 
  • #29
DiracPool said:
I initially wrote the whole program in Basic, but it was too slow. I found that there was one subroutine that was the issue, one that was repeated many times to move the "ship" up and down the screen. My remedy was to write the subroutine in machine/assembly language. ...
... I was blown away at the difference it made, that subroutine actually made it a fun, playable game.
Most of the first old computers ran an Interpreter Basic. I bought Borland's Turbo Basic that had the feature that allowed you to make calls to DOS interrupts. This made it possible to get your fingers into the computers hardware.

Unlike most BASIC implementations of this period, Turbo Basic was a full compiler which generated native code for MS-DOS.
 
  • #30
IDK, dlgoff, I'm not that sophistcated. Lol. I just remember I bought a cartridge that let me program in assembly language. Now you got me searching the web to find it. I don't want to do this cause it just reminds me of lost dreams...

I always think back on what "could have been" if I didn't drop the ball an try to become a professional surfer at 16, which didn't work out, along with all of my other hair-brained schemes. Speaking of which, I'm still working on hair-brained schemes that aren't working out.
 
  • #31
DiracPool said:
...I'm still working on hair-brained schemes that aren't working out.
Not to worry. I just completed the third revision of the level control for my automatic chicken watering system. :redface:

BTW Check out some of the things you can do with DOS INT 21h.
 
Last edited:
  • #32
dlgoff said:
Me too.

<< Giant image deleted by Mentor -- Try again Don! >>
Thanks Mentor for the deletion. Here's a smaller size but I had to make it an attachment.

attachment.php?attachmentid=71678&stc=1&d=1406422508.jpg



The reason I want to show it again was that I found the Deci-Lon's "Operator Manual". :biggrin:


18QQUor.jpg


ZKHrh8K.jpg
 

Attachments

  • sliderules.jpg
    sliderules.jpg
    28.9 KB · Views: 515
  • #33
My K+E from ~1973.

I used it during first year of university, until I bought a TI SR51 (20 memories) during early undergrad years, then a TI-58C with adjustable memory (50 or so registers, and modules) during my later undergrad years, and finally an HP-41CX (senior year for grad school).

I still use the HP-41CX (after about ~30 years).

I saw an even larger slide rule in a museum. I'll have to take a picture of it and post it later.
 

Attachments

  • KE_sliderule.jpg
    KE_sliderule.jpg
    32.9 KB · Views: 459
  • #34
Where's Integral? He posted yesterday that it was the 400th anniversary of Logarithms.

What would these bamboo computers look like, if not for Logarithms?

Abacuses?
 
  • #35
Astronuc said:
I saw an even larger slide rule in a museum. I'll have to take a picture of it and post it later.
Take a peek at this collection of classroom slide rules.

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-dWZR-4Wmw0k/TbjhJDV1fZI/AAAAAAAAAEk/azRJm2ukWzo/s1600/L1040716.JPG
 
  • #36
At my old HS, the physics classroom had a large slide rule which spanned the width of the chalkboard, and it was large enough to be visible to students sitting in the back of the class. Of course, once calculators (even expensive four-function ones) became available in the early '70s, I don't think the instructor or anyone else ever touched that classroom slide rule again.
 
  • #37
SteamKing said:
At my old HS, the physics classroom had a large slide rule which spanned the width of the chalkboard, and it was large enough to be visible to students sitting in the back of the class. Of course, once calculators (even expensive four-function ones) became available in the early '70s, I don't think the instructor or anyone else ever touched that classroom slide rule again.
My high school had one of those large slide rules above the chalkboard. I can't remember if it was in physics or chemistry, but I think it might have been portable (two people carrying it).

One of my classmates had one of the first TI calculators, but he had to use a slide rule just like the rest of us.

I first used an HP-35 during the summer of 1974. It had 9 memory registers. I was impressed. However, it cost something like $400.

The physics department of the first university I attended was desperately searching for any student, undergrad or graduate, who could program microprocessors to do physics calculations.
 
  • #38
I had bought a K+E slide rule, a fancy one, for taking physical science in HS in 1972. It could do logs, trig, etc. and had a fancy leather case. I don't recall ever using it for schoolwork, because soon after getting the SR and starting class, some of the students had some early calculators, including perhaps the HP-35. Well, that was way out of my price range, but my folks did get a 4-function Brother calculator, which was about the size and weight of a brick. I forget the price of the Brother, but it was cheaper than the HP.

Later, when I started chemistry about two years later, the Brother was hopelessly outdated, so I got a TI SR-50 scientific calculator, which cost about $150 IIRC. Not as cool perhaps as an HP, but it could hold its own.

The big news came in my senior year at HS when I was taking physics. One of my classmates, whose father was a petroleum engineer, traded in his HP-45 on the then brand-new HP-65 programmable, which then cost a whopping $795 retail (In those days, a new compact car had a base price of about $3500.) My father had retired from NASA by that time, and the Marshall SFC in Huntsville was offering HP-65s at a slight discount.

My folks snatched one up for me, but when I got the HP-65 and started using it, the display crapped out after a couple days, so I had to send it right back to HP to be fixed. I finally got it back later that summer, and it worked pretty much flawlessly, but I back slid to the old TI SR-50, which I used at college.

The HP-65 did have a neat plastic clam-shell carrying case, into which one could put the calculator, the charger, and a few of the magnetic cards which could be used to store programs for the calculator to load and execute.
 
Back
Top