What's the Story Behind My Vintage Computer Collection?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dlgoff
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Computer
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around participants sharing their experiences and memories related to vintage computers and electronic devices. The scope includes personal anecdotes, nostalgia for early computing, and the significance of various models in their lives.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants share images of their vintage computer collection, expressing pride in their functionality.
  • Others comment on specific features of the computers, such as the "chicken scratch" on a particular model.
  • Several participants reminisce about their own past experiences with vintage computers, including brands like Casio, Commodore, and Sun Microsystems.
  • One participant mentions the loss of their collection due to a flood, highlighting the emotional attachment to these devices.
  • Discussion includes the mention of various computing devices, such as sliderules and early handheld calculators, with some participants noting their own collections.
  • There are references to the challenges of sharing images due to changes in image hosting services, leading to some images being inaccessible.
  • Participants express curiosity about the age of the collections and whether any are for sale.
  • One participant humorously questions the existence of a "Power-Energy equivalence theorem" in the context of vintage computing, prompting playful responses.
  • Another participant shares a detailed account of their first computer experience with a Commodore Vic-20, including technical modifications they made.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally share a fondness for vintage computers and express nostalgia, but there are varying opinions on the significance and functionality of different models. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the accessibility of images and the specifics of certain devices.

Contextual Notes

Some images referenced in the discussion are no longer accessible due to changes in the hosting service, which may limit the context of certain comments. Additionally, there are unresolved questions about the age and condition of various collections.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in vintage computing, collectors of retro technology, and those nostalgic about early personal computing experiences may find this discussion engaging.

  • #31
DiracPool said:
...I'm still working on hair-brained schemes that aren't working out.
Not to worry. I just completed the third revision of the level control for my automatic chicken watering system. :redface:

BTW Check out some of the things you can do with DOS INT 21h.
 
Last edited:
Computer science news on Phys.org
  • #32
dlgoff said:
Me too.

<< Giant image deleted by Mentor -- Try again Don! >>
Thanks Mentor for the deletion. Here's a smaller size but I had to make it an attachment.

attachment.php?attachmentid=71678&stc=1&d=1406422508.jpg



The reason I want to show it again was that I found the Deci-Lon's "Operator Manual". :biggrin:


18QQUor.jpg


ZKHrh8K.jpg
 

Attachments

  • sliderules.jpg
    sliderules.jpg
    28.9 KB · Views: 528
  • #33
My K+E from ~1973.

I used it during first year of university, until I bought a TI SR51 (20 memories) during early undergrad years, then a TI-58C with adjustable memory (50 or so registers, and modules) during my later undergrad years, and finally an HP-41CX (senior year for grad school).

I still use the HP-41CX (after about ~30 years).

I saw an even larger slide rule in a museum. I'll have to take a picture of it and post it later.
 

Attachments

  • KE_sliderule.jpg
    KE_sliderule.jpg
    32.9 KB · Views: 473
  • #34
Where's Integral? He posted yesterday that it was the 400th anniversary of Logarithms.

What would these bamboo computers look like, if not for Logarithms?

Abacuses?
 
  • #35
Astronuc said:
I saw an even larger slide rule in a museum. I'll have to take a picture of it and post it later.
Take a peek at this collection of classroom slide rules.

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-dWZR-4Wmw0k/TbjhJDV1fZI/AAAAAAAAAEk/azRJm2ukWzo/s1600/L1040716.JPG
 
  • #36
At my old HS, the physics classroom had a large slide rule which spanned the width of the chalkboard, and it was large enough to be visible to students sitting in the back of the class. Of course, once calculators (even expensive four-function ones) became available in the early '70s, I don't think the instructor or anyone else ever touched that classroom slide rule again.
 
  • #37
SteamKing said:
At my old HS, the physics classroom had a large slide rule which spanned the width of the chalkboard, and it was large enough to be visible to students sitting in the back of the class. Of course, once calculators (even expensive four-function ones) became available in the early '70s, I don't think the instructor or anyone else ever touched that classroom slide rule again.
My high school had one of those large slide rules above the chalkboard. I can't remember if it was in physics or chemistry, but I think it might have been portable (two people carrying it).

One of my classmates had one of the first TI calculators, but he had to use a slide rule just like the rest of us.

I first used an HP-35 during the summer of 1974. It had 9 memory registers. I was impressed. However, it cost something like $400.

The physics department of the first university I attended was desperately searching for any student, undergrad or graduate, who could program microprocessors to do physics calculations.
 
  • #38
I had bought a K+E slide rule, a fancy one, for taking physical science in HS in 1972. It could do logs, trig, etc. and had a fancy leather case. I don't recall ever using it for schoolwork, because soon after getting the SR and starting class, some of the students had some early calculators, including perhaps the HP-35. Well, that was way out of my price range, but my folks did get a 4-function Brother calculator, which was about the size and weight of a brick. I forget the price of the Brother, but it was cheaper than the HP.

Later, when I started chemistry about two years later, the Brother was hopelessly outdated, so I got a TI SR-50 scientific calculator, which cost about $150 IIRC. Not as cool perhaps as an HP, but it could hold its own.

The big news came in my senior year at HS when I was taking physics. One of my classmates, whose father was a petroleum engineer, traded in his HP-45 on the then brand-new HP-65 programmable, which then cost a whopping $795 retail (In those days, a new compact car had a base price of about $3500.) My father had retired from NASA by that time, and the Marshall SFC in Huntsville was offering HP-65s at a slight discount.

My folks snatched one up for me, but when I got the HP-65 and started using it, the display crapped out after a couple days, so I had to send it right back to HP to be fixed. I finally got it back later that summer, and it worked pretty much flawlessly, but I back slid to the old TI SR-50, which I used at college.

The HP-65 did have a neat plastic clam-shell carrying case, into which one could put the calculator, the charger, and a few of the magnetic cards which could be used to store programs for the calculator to load and execute.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
49
Views
10K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K