My Professor says I have no talent - should I persist?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Erebus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Professor
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a student pursuing a double major in math and physics, expressing a strong passion for pure mathematics despite receiving discouraging feedback from their math advisor, who suggested they lack talent for it. The student has performed better in physics and is currently facing challenges in complex analysis, attributing their struggles to time constraints rather than a lack of understanding. Participants in the thread emphasize the importance of hard work, dedication, and the need for a backup plan, given the competitive nature of pure math and limited job opportunities in academia. They argue that while natural talent can be beneficial, it is not the sole determinant of success; persistence and effort are crucial. The conversation also touches on the necessity of evaluating one's academic performance and considering alternative paths in applied math or physics, while encouraging the student to pursue their passion for pure math if it brings them joy. Ultimately, the consensus is that while talent may play a role, hard work and a clear focus on goals are essential for achieving success in any field.
  • #61
mordechai9 said:
the average physicist
Please, there is a huge difference between applied, experimental, numerical and mathematical physics. Same as how there is a big gap between applied and pure maths, the difference between mathematical physics and the corresponding mathematical focuses is razor thin.
 

Similar threads

Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
572
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
9K
Replies
32
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K