The discussion centers around a student's struggle with pursuing a PhD in pure mathematics despite receiving discouraging feedback from their math advisor, who claimed the student lacks talent in the field. The student has performed adequately in proof-intensive courses, achieving a B- average, but expresses a deep passion for mathematics. Forum members emphasize the importance of persistence, hard work, and self-reflection in achieving academic goals, suggesting that natural talent is not the sole determinant of success in mathematics. They recommend considering backup plans and evaluating study techniques to improve performance.
PREREQUISITESStudents considering a career in mathematics, particularly those facing academic challenges or seeking guidance on pursuing advanced degrees. This discussion is also beneficial for academic advisors and educators looking to understand student motivations and the impact of feedback on academic persistence.
Please, there is a huge difference between applied, experimental, numerical and mathematical physics. Same as how there is a big gap between applied and pure maths, the difference between mathematical physics and the corresponding mathematical focuses is razor thin.mordechai9 said:the average physicist