My Terminal Velocity is Zero? (DE Question)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating terminal velocity in a physics problem involving a falling object. The user initially miscalculates the limit of velocity as time approaches infinity, mistakenly concluding that it is zero. The correct expression for terminal velocity is given as mg(1 - e^(-kt/m))/k, which approaches a non-zero value as time increases. The conversation also highlights the need for integration to find distance when velocity is not constant, correcting the user's misunderstanding of the relationship between velocity and distance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with exponential functions and limits
  • Basic knowledge of calculus, specifically integration
  • Concept of terminal velocity in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of terminal velocity in free fall scenarios
  • Learn about the application of limits in calculus
  • Explore integration techniques for non-constant velocity functions
  • Review Newton's second law and its implications in motion analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators looking for examples of real-world applications of calculus in motion analysis.

Bazzinga
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
[PLAIN]http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/11/60272414.png

Hey guys, I'm stuck on this question, part b)

I figured out a) and v(t) for V(0) = 0 ends up being

mg - mge-kt/m
k

(Sorry, latex was being difficult)

But then when I try to figure out the limit as t->infinity i get 0. I'm pretty sure the terminal velocity of jumping out of an airplane wouldn't be 0 :confused:

I'm hoping I just made a stupid mistake somewhere!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What you're getting, I assume, is...

\frac{mg\left(1-e^{-\frac{kt}{m}}\right)}{k}

I must say that as t\rightarrow\infty[/tex], that doesn't approach zero.
 
Ha, see? stupid mistake :P
 
Hold up, you still get 0... e^0 = 1, 1 - 1 = 0, mg0 = 0, 0/k = 0
 
But as t approaches infinity, you don't get e^0. You get e^(-infinity), which is 0.
 
Ohhh! I get it, thanks! About part c)... distance = velocity x time, so would I just multiply my equation by t? I can't seem to wrap my head around this stuff
 
No, x=vt only for constant v. If the v is not constant (as this v isn't), you have to integrate v with respect to t to get the distance.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K