Myers mass formula to find the valley of stability for A=56

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the Myers and Swiatecki mass formula (1969) to determine the valley of stability for the nucleus with mass number A=56. The formula incorporates various coefficients and parameters, including a1, a2, a3, J, K, L, M, Q, c1, c2, c3, and c4, all specified in MeV. The user is struggling to find the correct atomic number Z that minimizes the mass function M(A,Z), specifically obtaining Z=24 for M(56,24) and Z=26 for M(56,26). The formula is noted to be applicable only to even-even nuclei, and precision in the masses of protons and neutrons is emphasized as critical for accurate results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nuclear mass formulas, specifically Myers and Swiatecki (1969).
  • Familiarity with nuclear physics concepts such as atomic number (Z) and mass number (A).
  • Knowledge of coefficients used in nuclear mass calculations (e.g., a1, a2, J, K).
  • Proficiency in numerical precision for mass values of protons and neutrons.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the Myers and Swiatecki mass formula in detail, focusing on its application to even-even nuclei.
  • Investigate the significance of precision in proton and neutron mass values in nuclear calculations.
  • Explore the implications of using the mass formula for odd-even nuclei and its limitations.
  • Learn about alternative nuclear mass models and their comparative effectiveness.
USEFUL FOR

Nuclear physicists, researchers in nuclear stability, and students studying nuclear mass formulas will benefit from this discussion, particularly those focusing on the stability of even-even nuclei.

Leonardo Machado
Messages
56
Reaction score
2
Hi everyone.
I'm currently trying to master the use of the formula for nuclear masses from MYERS AND SWIATECKI (1969), https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003491669902024.

$$
E=[-a_1+J\delta^2+0.5(K\epsilon^2-2L\epsilon \delta^2 +M\delta^4)]A+c_2 Z^2 A^{1/3}
+[a_2(1+2\epsilon)+Q \tau^2]A^{2/3}+a_3A^{1/3} \\
+c_1\frac{Z^2}{A^{1/3}} (1-\epsilon+0.5\tau A^{-1/3}) -2c_2 Z^2 A^{1/3} -c_3 \frac{Z^2}{A} -c_4 \frac{Z^{4/3}}{A^{1/3}},
$$

where

$$
I=(A-2Z)/A,\\
\delta=(I+\frac{3}{8} \frac{c1}{Q} \frac{Z^2}{A^{5/3}})/(1+\frac{9}{4}\frac{J}{Q} A^{-1/3}),\\
\epsilon=\frac{1}{K}(-2a_2A{-1/3}+L\delta^2+c_1\frac{Z^2}{A^{4/3}}),\\
\tau=(\frac{3}{2}\frac{J}{Q}\delta-\frac{1}{4}\frac{c_1}{Q}\frac{Z^2}{A^{4/3}}).
$$

and the coefficients are ( in MeV):

$$
a_1=15.677, \\
a_2=18.56, \\
a_3=9.34, \\
J=28.062, \\
K=294.8, \\
L=123.53, \\
M=2.673, \\
Q=16,04, \\
c_1=0.717, \\
c_2=0.0001479, \\
c_3=0.84, \\
c_4=0.5475.
$$

The point is, i can't obtain the correct Z that minimizes $$M(A,Z)=Z m_p + (A-Z) m_n + E(A,Z)$$. I'm obtaining Z=24 because M(56,24)=55.948365... and M(56,26)=55.948670..

Does anyone use this formula and know if there is any detail that I'm not seen?

*This formula only works to even-even nuclei.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you expect to get?
How many digits did you use for the neutron and proton mass?
The two numbers are extremely similar (so similar that the electron masses will play a role).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K