Graduate N=2 Super Yang-Mills: Auxiliary Fields Question

Click For Summary
In N=2 Super Yang-Mills theory, the construction of the vector supermultiplet involves combining a chiral and a vector supermultiplet from N=1 supersymmetry. The discussion centers on whether to include the two auxiliary fields from the N=1 theory or to utilize a single auxiliary field for off-shell degrees of freedom. For N=1, off-shell counting indicates 2 bosonic degrees of freedom for the chiral supermultiplet and 1 for the vector, while N=2 requires 3 bosonic degrees of freedom for the vector supermultiplet. Confusion arises when attempting to derive the Lagrangian for the N=2 vector supermultiplet, as it appears to mirror that of the N=1 gauge theory. Clarification on off-shell counting and Lagrangian formulation is sought to resolve these issues.
StuartY
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I was wondering since the Vector supermultiplet in N=2 SUSY can be built from a Chiral and a Vector supermultiplet from N=1, in order to make up the off-shell degrees of freedom, would you include the two auxiliary fields from the N=1 theory (traditionally F from the Chiral and D from the vector multiplets), or would you make them up using a single auxiliary field? I'm sorry if this was a terrible question or has been poorly worded.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not familiar with N=2 SYM, but what does your off-shell counting suggest?
 
Sorry for the late reply. So off-shell for N=1 requires 2 bosonic d.o.f. for the chiral superultiplet, and 1 for the vector. For N=2 the vector supermultiplet requires 3 bosonic d.o.f.. I've been looking at this some more, and I think I'm getting even more confused because when I try and write out a Lagrangian for the N=2 vector supermultiplet I get the same Lagrangian as for the N=1 gauge theory.
 
"Supernovae evidence for foundational change to cosmological models" https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.15143 The paper claims: We compare the standard homogeneous cosmological model, i.e., spatially flat ΛCDM, and the timescape cosmology which invokes backreaction of inhomogeneities. Timescape, while statistically homogeneous and isotropic, departs from average Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker evolution, and replaces dark energy by kinetic gravitational energy and its gradients, in explaining...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
22K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K