N-Body Problem - Initial Values

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the N-Body Problem, particularly focusing on calculating ideal velocities for orbits and angular velocities within a simulated environment. Participants are exploring numerical methods, specifically a leapfrog algorithm, to model gravitational interactions among celestial bodies.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of ideal velocities for stable orbits and the angular velocities of bodies in the simulation. There is mention of balancing centripetal acceleration with gravitational forces for circular orbits. Questions arise about the implications of mass ratios and the nature of spin in planetary bodies.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with participants sharing insights about gravitational parameters and the relationship between velocity and distance in circular orbits. Some guidance has been provided regarding the calculation of velocities, but multiple interpretations and approaches are still being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of an analytical solution for the N-Body Problem when n≥3 and discuss the implications of using numerical methods. There are references to the complexities of planetary spin and the factors influencing it, such as collisions and gravitational interactions.

physxfreak
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,
I'm new here so let me introduce myself first:
I'm a games engineering student and my main field is programming


Right now I'm struggeling with the N-Body Problem, well I think actually solved parts of it:
I've implemented the basic equations with a leapfrog algorithm and they seem to be working correctly


Now I have 2 questions:

1.)
When I place a star at a certain position, I want to calculate the ideal velocity in order to produce an orbit. How is this achieved?

2.)
How can I calculate the Angular Velocity for an NBody-Problem?

----------------------------------
My current setup (as reference):

sun (position=0,0,0; mass=333, velocity=0,0,0)
earth(position=-50,0,0, mass=1, velocity=0,0,2)

This is producing a stable circular orbit
It is also possible to add more Earth's/planets with stable orbits
I know that the mass ratio is not quite right, but i want to achieve a "compressed universe"
----------------------------------------

I would appreciate your help on this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Right now I'm struggeling with the N-Body Problem,
everybody does - you realize there is no analytical solution?
well I think actually solved parts of it
...depending on what you mean by "solved" of course :)
I mean to show you that physicists think of the n-body problem a bit differently to comp-scientists ... I'm guessing you are trying some sort of parallel processing?
Now I have 2 questions:

1.)
When I place a star at a certain position, I want to calculate the ideal velocity in order to produce an orbit. How is this achieved?
For a particular stable orbit, the velocity (and speed) will be different for different parts of the orbit. For a circular orbit, you just need to balance centripetal acceleration for both bodies with the force of gravity on them.

2.)
How can I calculate the Angular Velocity for an NBody-Problem?
That would be the angular velocity of each body in the problem?

$$\vec{\omega}=\frac{\vec{r}\times\vec{v}}{|\vec{r}|^2}$$

...which requires that you know the velocities of course.
The exact approach depends on how you are setting up your simulation.
 
Hi physxfreak; Welcome to Physics Forums.

If you've got a particular set of conditions that produces a circular orbit you can calculate the gravitational parameter for your simulated solar system.

The circular orbit velocity for a planet of negligible mass at distance r from a Sun of mass M is given by:

$$v = \sqrt{\frac{GM}{r}}$$

If you solve for μ = GM, then you can use this parameter to find the required speed for circular orbits of other radii. Note that if you have a known radius and velocity you don't even need the mass of the star to find the parameter μ. Even in "real life", μ = GM for our solar system is known with more accuracy than G or M alone.
 
Simon Bridge said:
everybody does - you realize there is no analytical solution?...depending on what you mean by "solved" of course :)
Yes I know that the N-Body Problem is unsolved for n>=3, but I'm using a numerical solution (with a leapfrog algorithm)

Simon Bridge said:
I'm guessing you are trying some sort of parallel processing?
No not at the moment, as i have a quite small problem size (n<100) at the moment

Simon Bridge said:
That would be the angular velocity of each body in the problem?

$$\vec{\omega}=\frac{\vec{r}\times\vec{v}}{|\vec{r}|^2}$$

...which requires that you know the velocities of course.
The exact approach depends on how you are setting up your simulation.

Well I'm searching for a way to calculate the "spin" of each planet, like the Earth rotating around it's own axis 365 days a year. But I assume that this spin was given by collisions rather than the gravitational force?

@Gneil:
Thanks, that is exactly what i looked for :)
 
Well I'm searching for a way to calculate the "spin" of each planet, like the Earth rotating around it's own axis 365 days a year. But I assume that this spin was given by collisions rather than the gravitational force?
The spin is not something that is determined by anything you can tell from the final state of the body no.

I think models of how planets form have been changing recently - very loosly, they form out of eddies in the planetary nebula surrounding the proto-star, the spin would be mostly affected by that. Any random collection of particles will gravitate to a spinning sphere-oid ... but you are right that collisions once solidified will also affect things, as will the presence of satellites and gravitational resonances like tide-locking (and see mercury).

For most planets you can just pick a rotation to suit yourself.
Close orbiting bodies will have some sort of resonance.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K