What is the value of the second term in the commutator for an N particle system?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on evaluating the second term in the commutator for an N-particle system, specifically the expression involving the potential energy. The first term of the commutator is established to be zero due to the conservation of momentum stemming from translation symmetry. The second term, which involves the potential function of relative coordinates, is argued to also be zero by applying Noether's theorem and examining the symmetry under simultaneous translations. A Taylor expansion approach is suggested to further clarify the behavior of the potential. Ultimately, the analysis concludes that both terms in the commutator vanish, reinforcing the implications of translation symmetry in quantum mechanics.
B4cklfip
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Given is the Hamiltonian H of a n particle system and it should be shown that H and P commucate, thus [H,P] = 0.
Where P is given as $$P = \sum_{n=1}^N p_n.$$
Relevant Equations
$$H = \sum_{n=1}^N \frac{p_n^2}{2m_n} +\frac{1}{2}\sum_{n,n'}^N V(|x_n-x_n'|)$$
I have insertet the equations for H and P in the relation for the commutator which gives

$$[H,P] = [\sum_{n=1}^N \frac{p_n^2}{2m_n} +\frac{1}{2}\sum_{n,n'}^N V(|x_n-x_n'|),\sum_{n=1}^N p_n]
\\ = [\sum_{n=1}^N \frac{p_n^2}{2m_n},\sum_{n=1}^N p_n]+\frac{1}{2}[\sum_{n,n'}^N V(|x_n-x_n'|),\sum_{n=1}^N p_n]$$

The first term should become zero, but what about the second term? I don't really know how to go on here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The potential is the function of only relative coordinates. If I translate all of them simultaneously,the potencial won't change i.e it has translation symmetry. It is well known to people in physics that translation symmetry implies conservation of momentum (Noether Theorem). So, the commutator becomes zero.
If you are not satisfied(Since you didn't see Mathematics), then try Taylor's expansion of ##H(x_i+a)## around ##x_i=a## to first order.
Reference: Modern Quantum Mechanics,J.J Sakurai.
 
To see how it works, try writing out explicitly the expression ##\frac{1}{2} \left[ \sum_{m,n}^N V(|x_m-x_n|),\sum_{n=1}^N p_n \right]## for the case N = 2.
 
We have ##\frac{\partial}{\partial p_i}\sum_{n=1}^N p_n = 1## for all ##i=1,2,...,N##. If you show that the terms in ##\sum_i \frac{\partial}{\partial x_i} \sum_{n,n'}^N V(|x_n-x_{n'}|)## cancel each other out, then you get ## \left[\sum_{n,n'}^N V(|x_n-x_{n'}|),\sum_{n=1}^N p_n\right]=0##. You can look at the sum of the two terms ##\frac{\partial V(|x_k-x_m|)}{\partial x_k}+\frac{\partial V(|x_k-x_m|)}{\partial x_m}## for some ##k\neq m## and try to show that this is 0.
 
  • Like
Likes Abhishek11235

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K