N-term matrix problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter transgalactic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Term
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
7 replies · 2K views
Physics news on Phys.org
Why not set it up as |A − λI| = 0 (where I is the identity matrix), then solve for λ?
 
it makes no difference

my gowl was to find the determinat
and that what i have done
now what next??
i encountered some really tough problems

??
 
Just start with the formula I stated, then proceed from there.
 
i know your formula
youll noticed that i used it
but in a different step
i don't think there is any difference
i have trouble to finish it
 
EnumaElish said:
Why not set it up as |A − λI| = 0 (where I is the identity matrix), then solve for λ?
That's exactly what he did. Although he miswrote it as det A= ... when he has det A-[itex]\lambda[/itex]I after the "=".


transgalactic, for [itex]\lambda= 1[/itex] you have [itex]x_2+ x_3+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ x_n= 0[/itex], [itex]-x_2= x_2[/itex], ..., [itex]-x_n= x_n[/itex]. What does that give you? (It should give you one simple vector.)

For [itex]\lamba= 0[/itex], you have [itex]x_1+ x_2+ \cdot\cdot\dot+ x_n= 0[/itex]. What does that give you? (n- 1 vectors)
 
for L=1
you got the expression of x2 in "n" terms
i can't do it indefinetly

for L=0
i know that i have n-1 vectors

what do i do now
what do i right as the answer of the question
??
 
For [itex]\lambda= 1[/itex] you have, as I said before, [itex]-x_2= x_2[/itex],[itex]-x_3= x_3[/itex], etc. That tells you that [itex]x_2= x_3= \cdot\cdot\cdot= 0[/itex]! Then, of course, the first equation, [itex]x_2+ x_1+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ x_n= 0[/itex] is automatically satisfied. Every number except [itex]x_1[/itex] must be 0. Since [itex]x_1[/itex] does not appear in any equation, it is arbitrary. All eigenvectors corresponding to [itex]\lambda= 1[/itex] are of the form <a, 0, 0, ..., 0> which is spanned, of course, by <1, 0, 0, ..., 0>.

If [itex]\lambda= 0[/itex] then you have the single equation [itex]x_1+ x_2+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ \x_n= 0[/itex] which is the same as [itex]x_n= -(x_1+ x_2+ x_3+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ x_{n-1})[/itex].
Now do as I have suggested before: take each [itex]x_i[/itex] equal to 0 in turn, the others 0, and solve for [itex]x_n[/itex]. That will give you the n-1 vectors you need.