NASA Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter successfully performs orbital insertion

  • Context: NASA 
  • Thread starter Thread starter enigma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mars Nasa Orbital
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the successful orbital insertion of NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) and the subsequent communication re-establishment with the spacecraft. Participants explore the implications of the mission's success, the timeline for data availability, and the operational procedures involved in the insertion process.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the MRO had to go around the far side of Mars for orbital insertion, which was part of the planned procedure.
  • Concerns were raised about the loss of contact during the far side maneuver, with some questioning whether NASA would have known about the loss of signal.
  • There is a mention of the historical context, where two of the four previous missions to Mars failed during orbital insertion.
  • Participants express excitement about the successful re-establishment of two-way communications, indicating that the insertion was successful.
  • Some participants discuss the timeline for receiving data from the MRO, questioning why it would take until November for real data to be sent back.
  • There are speculations about NASA's cautious approach to data release and the aerobraking process required to finalize the orbit.
  • One participant mentions that the primary science phase for MRO will begin in November, linking it to the communication limitations due to Mars being in opposition.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the successful orbital insertion and the re-establishment of communication. However, there are differing views on the timeline for data availability and the reasons behind NASA's cautious approach, indicating unresolved questions and varying perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty regarding the timeline for data release and the aerobraking process, highlighting the complexities involved in the mission's operations.

enigma
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,739
Reaction score
20
This just in:

They just re-acquired signal with the MRO after it went around the far side of Mars.

They are waiting to ensure it is in the correct orbit right now.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Was it soppsed to go on the farside of mars?Wouldn't they knew it lost contact?
 
scott1 said:
Was it soppsed to go on the farside of mars?Wouldn't they knew it lost contact?

Yes,

It had to go around to the far side for the orbital insertion. The fact that they re-established communications on time meant that the insertion was a success.

They have lost 2 of the 4 missions they've sent there in the last 15 years during orbital insertion.
 
Two way communications successful. MRO is in orbit!

This is great news!
 
GREAT! And the success rate is going up again. :biggrin:
 
scott1 said:
Was it soppsed to go on the farside of mars?Wouldn't they knew it lost contact?
Yes, it is supposed to go behind Mars since it is traversing the ecliptic. It pretty much went according to plan. They just have to sit tight and hope it functioned as planned - and it did.

On Cue, Spacecraft Glides into Orbit Around Mars
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5257061

All Things Considered, March 10, 2006 · Mission controllers at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif., burst into applause as the Reconnaissance Orbiter arrives safely to Mars. Only about two-thirds of NASA's Mars missions have survived. The spacecraft is supposed to gather more information about Mars than all previous missions combined.
 
Great news. I love the work people at NASA do.
 
  • #10
I heard that we have to wait until November before there is any real data sent back. Why so long? Does that time frame include NASA going thru it and scrubbing it before public release?
 
  • #11
FredGarvin said:
I heard that we have to wait until November before there is any real data sent back. Why so long? Does that time frame include NASA going thru it and scrubbing it before public release?
That's not that long compared to how long it took gailo,voyger and some probes to there planets.I think NASA trying to be carful they probally don't want to go on tv and say "The $2billon prob crashed" there probally just to craful.
 
  • #12
scott1 said:
That's not that long compared to how long it took gailo,voyger and some probes to there planets.I think NASA trying to be carful they probally don't want to go on tv and say "The $2billon prob crashed" there probally just to craful.
I figured it would be something like that, but 8 months? That's awfully cautious.
 
  • #13
FredGarvin said:
I figured it would be something like that, but 8 months? That's awfully cautious.
You do pay taxes right?
 
  • #14
They have to aerobrake it into the final orbit. I'm just guessing, but they probably don't want to deploy the scopes until they're done with that phase.
 
  • #15
MRO Primary Science Phase- Begins in Nov.

The data from MRO will not be available until November because Mars will be in opposition and NASA will lose/have limited communication with the spacecraft before Nov.
 
  • #16
" Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter successfully performs orbital insertion"

I think I need a shower now!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
15K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 116 ·
4
Replies
116
Views
23K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K