Navigating Purcell's Physics Course: Challenges & Solutions

  • Thread starter Thread starter ender2309
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Course Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges faced by students using Purcell's physics textbook, particularly regarding the clarity of explanations and the lack of answer keys for practice problems. The focus includes the relativity sections and their application to electric and magnetic fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty with the wordiness of Purcell's textbook and the absence of answer keys for practice problems.
  • Another participant inquires if the issues are specifically with the relativity sections of the textbook.
  • A different participant suggests that students can post their problem attempts for feedback, countering the claim about the lack of resources.
  • A participant mentions that while they find relativity manageable, they struggle with its application to electric and magnetic fields, specifically the equations related to E' and B.
  • One participant notes that solutions to many problems in Purcell can be found online and discusses the challenges of comprehending relativistic electromagnetism as presented in the book.
  • Another participant recommends Schwartz's Principles of Electrodynamics as a supplementary resource, acknowledging its higher level compared to Purcell.
  • A participant shares that reading Griffiths' textbook helped clarify their understanding of the material.
  • Another participant mentions using Jackson's textbook, implying a preference for it over Purcell.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of difficulty with Purcell's textbook, particularly regarding relativity. There is no consensus on the best approach to overcoming these challenges, as some suggest alternative texts while others focus on peer feedback.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the limitations of Purcell's explanations and the potential need for supplementary resources, but do not resolve the issues regarding clarity or the effectiveness of alternative texts.

ender2309
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
My honors physics course is working with Purcell's textbook, but I've found some sections of the book are quite wordy and hard to follow, and i don't have any way to check my practice work: there are virtually no answers to any of the practice questions.
thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is it the relativity sections of Purcell that you are having trouble with?
 
ender2309 said:
... and i don't have any way to check my practice work: there are virtually no answers to any of the practice questions.

Not true. :smile: You are free to post your attempts at problems here and get feedback.
 
Daverz said:
Is it the relativity sections of Purcell that you are having trouble with?

yeah, not so much the actual relativity work (I've always found it to be more or less of a breeze), but the application to electric fields and magnetic fields.

essentially, my biggest problem right now comes down to magnetics. i know that E' parallel=E parallel and E' perpendicular is equal to gamma(Eperp+beta cross Bperp),

but i don't know how to apply that, at all.
 
Assuming you're interested in noble purposes, the solutions to a great many of the problems in Purcell are available somewhere online, simply through a google search.

Also, if you're having trouble comprehending the discussion of relativistic E&M in Purcell you're somewhat out of luck, since that's the lowest level introduction I know of (lower level texts usually don't go into it, and higher level texts like Griffiths have a more advanced approach). That said, it might be worth it to read the section in griffiths merely to give a different wording.
 
The only other undergrad book I know of that covers E&M from a relativistic standpoint is Schwartz's Principles of Electrodynamics. It is a beautiful book, but at a higher level than Purcell. Still it's inexpensive (Dover edition) and you might find it fills in gaps in understanding.
 
thanks! a friend of mine ended up having griffiths, and i guess it was just the way purcell explained it that tripped me up, because after reading the relevant sections there it cleared up immediately.
 
Jackson is what I use.
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K