Need a few details ironed out(right section?)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Skiddy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Section
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the historical context of the 1893 World's Fair and the technical details of DC power transmission, particularly in relation to the rivalry between Edison and Tesla/Westinghouse. Participants explore the mechanisms of how DC power is generated and delivered, with a focus on the challenges and advantages of AC versus DC systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that AC is easier to generate than DC, as AC comes directly from generator coils while DC requires rectifiers or switches for conversion.
  • There is a discussion on the need for multiple coils to create a smoother DC signal, as using a single coil results in pulsing DC.
  • Participants mention that non-pulsing DC radiates less electromagnetic energy, leading to reduced energy waste in transmission lines.
  • Both AC and DC systems experience energy loss due to electrical resistance in lines, but using high voltage and low current can minimize these losses.
  • It is highlighted that converting AC to DC is simpler for low power applications, while converting DC voltages is more complex and costly, which supports the argument for AC systems.
  • One participant expresses frustration over being perceived as seeking homework help, emphasizing their extensive research and the limited scope of the technical details needed for their paper.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the assistance being sought, with some perceiving it as homework help while others defend the request as a legitimate inquiry into a complex topic. The technical discussion regarding AC and DC remains unresolved, with multiple perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes varying levels of technical understanding among participants, with some seeking simplified explanations while others provide detailed technical insights. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity involved in converting DC power, which may not be fully addressed in the responses.

Skiddy
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I was going to post this in the homework section, but I wasn't a hundred percent sure where it would fit. I'm writing a paper over the 1893 World's Fair and the battle between Edison and Tesla/Westinghouse after the fair. I'm doing my orienting before I delve into my thesis statement and I'm a bit hazy on the details of the inner workings of DC power.

I've looked on the internet and I can't seem to find a straight answer as to how it goes from generator to home. I need to be as accurate as possible, as this is a history paper, and if anyone has a link, or even some useful input, I'd appreciate it!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
AC and DC (for grid power) each have advantages and disadvantages. The main ones are:

Its easier to generate AC than it is to generate DC. AC comes directly off the coils of a generator. You need rectifiers or switches (brushes) to convert it to DC. Also, if you use only the voltage from one coil and convert it to DC, it will still be pulsing DC. So you need to use a lot of coils where the pulses from the coils come at different times. That way if you combine the pulses from all the coils you end up with an almost smooth DC signal. But it still isn't perfectly smooth. You can smooth it further with capacitors, but high power applications would need massive and extremely expensive capacitors.

When (non-pulsing) DC is sent through power lines, far less electromagnetic energy is radiated from the lines, which means less energy is wasted.

Both AC and DC suffer from energy wasted because of the electrical resistance of the lines.

Electrical power is proportional to the product of the current (electron flow) and voltage (electron pressure). If you use high voltage and low current, the resistive losses in a long transmission line are less. So Ideally you convert the electricity to high voltage and low current before you send it a long distance through wires, then convert it back to a more reasonable (safe and easy to manage) voltage at the load end. Conversion of AC is done with transformers. Converting DC in this way is profoundly more problematic.

The simple voltage/current conversion is also very useful within appliances.

Many appliances need DC. So the AC must be converted to DC. However, they typically need a certain DC voltage. Since conversion of DC voltage is more complicated (and costly when large power is involved) this is still a pro-AC argument, because converting AC of one voltage to AC of another voltage is easy (with a transformer) and converting low power AC to DC (for a household appliance, for example) is easy with a rectifier and small cheap capacitor.
 
Last edited:
fleem said:
AC and DC (for grid power) each have advantages and disadvantages. The main ones are:

Its easier to generate AC than it is to generate DC. AC comes directly off the coils of a generator. You need rectifiers or switches (brushes) to convert it to DC. Also, if you use only the voltage from one coil and convert it to DC, it will still be pulsing DC. So you need to use a lot of coils where the pulses from the coils come at different times. That way if you combine the pulses from all the coils you end up with an almost smooth DC signal. But it still isn't perfectly smooth. You can smooth it further with capacitors, but high power applications would need massive and extremely expensive capacitors.

When (non-pulsing) DC is sent through power lines, far less electromagnetic energy is radiated from the lines, which means less energy is wasted.

Both AC and DC suffer from energy wasted because of the electrical resistance of the lines.

Electrical power is proportional to the product of the current (electron flow) and voltage (electron pressure). If you use high voltage and low current, the resistive losses in a long transmission line are less. So Ideally you convert the electricity to high voltage and low current before you send it a long distance through wires, then convert it back to a more reasonable (safe and easy to manage) voltage at the load end. Conversion of AC is done with transformers. Converting DC in this way is profoundly more problematic.

The simple voltage/current conversion is also very useful within appliances.

Many appliances need DC. So the AC must be converted to DC. However, they typically need a certain DC voltage. Since conversion of DC voltage is more complicated (and costly when large power is involved) this is still a pro-AC argument, because converting AC of one voltage to AC of another voltage is easy (with a transformer) and converting low power AC to DC (for a household appliance, for example) is easy with a rectifier and small cheap capacitor.

Thanks, Fleem, I really appreciate it!
 
fleem said:
AC and DC (for grid power) each have advantages and disadvantages. The main ones are:

Its easier to generate AC than it is to generate DC. AC comes directly off the coils of a generator. You need rectifiers or switches (brushes) to convert it to DC. Also, if you use only the voltage from one coil and convert it to DC, it will still be pulsing DC. So you need to use a lot of coils where the pulses from the coils come at different times. That way if you combine the pulses from all the coils you end up with an almost smooth DC signal. But it still isn't perfectly smooth. You can smooth it further with capacitors, but high power applications would need massive and extremely expensive capacitors.

When (non-pulsing) DC is sent through power lines, far less electromagnetic energy is radiated from the lines, which means less energy is wasted.

Both AC and DC suffer from energy wasted because of the electrical resistance of the lines.

Electrical power is proportional to the product of the current (electron flow) and voltage (electron pressure). If you use high voltage and low current, the resistive losses in a long transmission line are less. So Ideally you convert the electricity to high voltage and low current before you send it a long distance through wires, then convert it back to a more reasonable (safe and easy to manage) voltage at the load end. Conversion of AC is done with transformers. Converting DC in this way is profoundly more problematic.

The simple voltage/current conversion is also very useful within appliances.

Many appliances need DC. So the AC must be converted to DC. However, they typically need a certain DC voltage. Since conversion of DC voltage is more complicated (and costly when large power is involved) this is still a pro-AC argument, because converting AC of one voltage to AC of another voltage is easy (with a transformer) and converting low power AC to DC (for a household appliance, for example) is easy with a rectifier and small cheap capacitor.

Skiddy said:
Thanks, Fleem, I really appreciate it!

Yeah, it's nice to have somebody do your homework for you, isn't it?
 
berkeman said:
Yeah, it's nice to have somebody do your homework for you, isn't it?

No, he wasn't doing my homework for me. I've done extensive research for this paper and couldn't find anything that could lay it out in layman's terms for me. Actually, this subject has very little to do with the paper itself and has helped me with the last half of a paragraph in an 11 page paper. I don't mean to sound defensive, but I don't appreciate someone belittling the work I've done based on the fact that I couldn't understand a subject unrelated to my field of study.
 
Skiddy said:
No, he wasn't doing my homework for me. I've done extensive research for this paper and couldn't find anything that could lay it out in layman's terms for me. Actually, this subject has very little to do with the paper itself and has helped me with the last half of a paragraph in an 11 page paper. I don't mean to sound defensive, but I don't appreciate someone belittling the work I've done based on the fact that I couldn't understand a subject unrelated to my field of study.

The upset face icon was directed at fleem, who should know better than to provide so much help on a schoowork project. Perhaps that wasn't clear with my multiquote. I've moved this thread now to the Homework Help forums -- if it had been posted here originally (per the PF rules), perhaps fleem would not have provided so much of a solution in his try to be helpful.
 
berkeman said:
The upset face icon was directed at fleem, who should know better than to provide so much help on a schoowork project. Perhaps that wasn't clear with my multiquote. I've moved this thread now to the Homework Help forums -- if it had been posted here originally (per the PF rules), perhaps fleem would not have provided so much of a solution in his try to be helpful.
Ah, it looks as though I'm the one who has jumped to conclusions this time. Sorry about the misunderstanding.
 
Skiddy said:
Ah, it looks as though I'm the one who has jumped to conclusions this time. Sorry about the misunderstanding.

No worries. It sounds like you did a good job on your paper. BTW, this thread helps to explain why the PF Homework Help rules are the way they are:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=373889

Welcome to the PF!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
36K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
11K