- #1
ploom
- 2
- 0
Hello Physicists,
A drunk driver plowed into my house 6 months ago. The house has been "cosmetically" repaired. Now, I am noticing the cedar siding splitting and separating in the back of the house, directly opposite of where the car hit the wall holding the steel beam. It's a fairly small house.
Both the contractor and the insurance company have inspected it and said that it couldn't possibly be a residual effect of the speeding car. I disagree. They explained it would have been a dominoe effect and that all the drywall, etc. in between the front hit and the back splits would show some damage. The inside of my house is fine, no cracks.
I disagree with their explanation. I am thinking of the example of starting a game of croquette, where you support one ball with your foot and place the ball you are serving touching the ball you are stablizing. You smack the supported ball with the mallet which then sends the serving ball on it's way.
I'm also thinking of the desk toy with the metal balls suspended on wires. You drop the end ball into the line of balls and the one on the opposite end is the one that moves.
I realize insurance appraisers have their own agenda, to keep claims low. What I would like to know is, in order to take my case to civil court against the driver in order to have the back of my house repaired, do you think it is possible that the damage in the back of the house was most likely caused by the impact of the car? He was traveling between 30-50 mph.
I would really like your advice on this before I spend $400 to hire a structural engineer to come out and verify it.
I'm a single Mom on a teacher's salary, and I don't want to get ripped off, but I also don't want to waste $400 if it is not likely caused by the accident.
Thanks for any and all input!
GA Tech Mom
A drunk driver plowed into my house 6 months ago. The house has been "cosmetically" repaired. Now, I am noticing the cedar siding splitting and separating in the back of the house, directly opposite of where the car hit the wall holding the steel beam. It's a fairly small house.
Both the contractor and the insurance company have inspected it and said that it couldn't possibly be a residual effect of the speeding car. I disagree. They explained it would have been a dominoe effect and that all the drywall, etc. in between the front hit and the back splits would show some damage. The inside of my house is fine, no cracks.
I disagree with their explanation. I am thinking of the example of starting a game of croquette, where you support one ball with your foot and place the ball you are serving touching the ball you are stablizing. You smack the supported ball with the mallet which then sends the serving ball on it's way.
I'm also thinking of the desk toy with the metal balls suspended on wires. You drop the end ball into the line of balls and the one on the opposite end is the one that moves.
I realize insurance appraisers have their own agenda, to keep claims low. What I would like to know is, in order to take my case to civil court against the driver in order to have the back of my house repaired, do you think it is possible that the damage in the back of the house was most likely caused by the impact of the car? He was traveling between 30-50 mph.
I would really like your advice on this before I spend $400 to hire a structural engineer to come out and verify it.
I'm a single Mom on a teacher's salary, and I don't want to get ripped off, but I also don't want to waste $400 if it is not likely caused by the accident.
Thanks for any and all input!
GA Tech Mom