Need help calculating angle with coefficient of static friction

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the angle at which a box will begin to slide on a plank, given a coefficient of static friction of 0.33. Participants are exploring the forces acting on the box, including the normal force and gravitational components, while attempting to set up the equations of motion relevant to this scenario.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conditions for impending motion and the application of Newton's second law. There are attempts to clarify expressions related to net forces and the role of static friction. Some participants express confusion regarding the setup of equations and the isolation of the angle θ.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on drawing free body diagrams and summing forces in different directions. There is recognition of the need to relate the frictional force to the normal force and the gravitational force components. Multiple interpretations of the equations are being explored, and participants are collaboratively questioning and refining their understanding of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of mass in some equations and the implications of static friction's maximum value. The weight of the box is mentioned as 10 kg, which may influence the calculations being discussed.

Fireant
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
There's a box sitting on a plank. The coefficient of static friction is 0.33. I want to figure out at which angle the box will begin to slide if the plank is tilted.


I know the factors that come into play are FN, Fg or Fgx, and Fs.



So far I have

Fnet= FN-Fs-Fg
=FN- μs-sin∅
=cos∅-0.33-sin∅

This doesn't look right... can anyone help me out?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What are the conditions for impending motion using Newton's second law?

I would suggest looking at the horizontal and vertical scalar equations of motion of the block and solving for \theta.

I'm having a bit of difficulty following your work. Could you clarify your last expression? (It looks like F_{net} = \cos\theta-0.33-\sin\theta to me.)
 
Im assuming there's no acceleration, so Fnet= 0N.

This is the symbol for theta: θ

I used this symbol for "angle":∅

""""I'm having a bit of difficulty following your work. Could you clarify your last expression? (It looks like F_{net} = \cos\theta-0.33-\sin\theta to me.) """"

That's pretty much it! Except using angle to substitute for theta.

I don't know how to get to the angle...

I'm missing mass from the equation too right?
 
Last edited:
Fireant said:
Im assuming there's no acceleration, so Fnet= 0N.
That's right. Impending motion, if you are unfamiliar with the term, is the point right before motion starts.

There's one more condition dealing with static friction. What would that be? (Remember how static friction works; is there a maximum value? What is it?)

Fireant said:
That's pretty much it! It's wrong... I don't know how to get to the angle...

I'm missing mass from the equation too right?

The first place to start is by drawing a free body diagram of the situation. We know the block is tilted at some angle \theta at which the box will just start to move, so what forces act on the block?

Next, sum the forces in the x and y directions (I would suggest using a coordinate system aligned with the ramp.). From these two equations (plus an expression relating the frictional force and the normal force) you should be able to find \theta.
 
jhae2.718 said:
There's one more condition dealing with static friction. What would that be? (Remember how static friction works; is there a maximum value? What is it?)

0.33 ?

The first place to start is by drawing a free body diagram of the situation. We know the block is tilted at some angle \theta at which the box will just start to move, so what forces act on the block?

Force of gravity in the x compenent, the normal force, and the force of friction.

Next, sum the forces in the x and y directions (I would suggest using a coordinate system aligned with the ramp.). From these two equations (plus an expression relating the frictional force and the normal force) you should be able to find \theta.

So you mean :

x

Fnet= Fgx
=mg(sin∅)-Fs
=mg(sin∅)-μs

and

y

Fnet=FN
0= mgcos∅

So far so good?

One more thing: The weight of the box is 10kg
 
\mu_s is the coefficient of static friction, not the force of friction. So, what is the force of friction in this case?

You're almost there!
 
So... since

μs= Ff/FN
0.33=Ff/mg
Ff=0.33(10)(9.8)
Ff=32.34N

?
 
Static friction is given by F_s \leqslant \mu_s N, so F_{s,max}=\mu_s N. So, from this and the FBD we can get the friction force as a function of mass, gravitational acceleration, and the angle \theta.

What is this force, and how can we substitute it to find \theta?

Hint: the final answer will be independent of mass and gravitational acceleration.
 
You're saying

Fsmax=m(μs)FN

and I'm not sure what to subsitute the force with...
 
  • #10
so technically...

if i know Fg and FN, I can figure out the angle?

So

tan∅= 32.34/9.8
∅=73°

?
 
  • #11
Close, but not quite.

F_{s,max} = \mu_sN = \mu_s mg\cos\theta.

Then if ma = 0 = mg\sin\theta - \mu_s mg\cos\theta, what is \theta?

Sorry for the latency in response, just got out of class.
 
  • #12
No I really appreciate your help... getting my noggin working...

Fsmax=musN
=mus(mg)(costheta)

0=mgsinθ-mμs(mg)cosθ

that's the part where I'm confused... how do i isolate theta?
 
  • #13
Fireant said:
No I really appreciate your help... getting my noggin working...

Fsmax=musN
=mus(mg)(costheta)

0=mgsinθ-mμs(mg)cosθ

that's the part where I'm confused... how do i isolate theta?

Maybe you could try moving \mu_s mg \cos\theta to the other side and using trigonometry? Also, what can you do with the mg term?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
48
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K